From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There seems to be consensus that the subject has sufficient coverage to pass WP:BASIC. Issues concerning potential promotionalism remain, but presumably can be handled via normal editing. Ad Orientem ( talk) 00:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Michael Bailey-Gates

Michael Bailey-Gates (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are a handful of "interviews" in a few magazines, amounting to three or four sentences, about 50 to 75 words. No coverage in depth of Michael Bailey-Gates. Lots of passing mention and trivial covrage, such as having his photos of more notable people appear in notable publications, or articles about other subjects mentioning Bailey-Gates in passing. No major awards or significant body of work, so can't find any way for this to pas WP:ANYBIO, WP:ARTIST, or WP:GNG Dennis Bratland ( talk) 19:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Yes, I missed that Vice article. Thanks for pointing it out. I can't say it's enough to change my mind but it makes a good case. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 06:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There seems to be consensus that the subject has sufficient coverage to pass WP:BASIC. Issues concerning potential promotionalism remain, but presumably can be handled via normal editing. Ad Orientem ( talk) 00:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Michael Bailey-Gates

Michael Bailey-Gates (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are a handful of "interviews" in a few magazines, amounting to three or four sentences, about 50 to 75 words. No coverage in depth of Michael Bailey-Gates. Lots of passing mention and trivial covrage, such as having his photos of more notable people appear in notable publications, or articles about other subjects mentioning Bailey-Gates in passing. No major awards or significant body of work, so can't find any way for this to pas WP:ANYBIO, WP:ARTIST, or WP:GNG Dennis Bratland ( talk) 19:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Yes, I missed that Vice article. Thanks for pointing it out. I can't say it's enough to change my mind but it makes a good case. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 06:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook