The result was keep. And a {{ trout}} to the nominator, who is reminded that AfD is not for cleanup, and that "Nobody's working on it" is a argument to avoid. The Bushranger One ping only 00:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC) reply
90% of this article is unsubstantiated by reliable references. 50% of the article appears to be primary research. I edited it a little yesterday and received 6 disambiguation errors, not from edits I added. Probably this has occurred before to others, but no one bothered to fix them. Apparently this article is so bad everyone seems to be avoiding it, including me from now on. At my first attempt in July at fixing citations, I could resolve none of them. The primary editor assured me he could fix them, but since my first visit in July there have been zero edits by the primary. It needs a total rewrite, but it's not something I'm interested in doing. It's an embarrassment that should at least be hidden from public view, perhaps in AfC. :- ) Don 13:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. And a {{ trout}} to the nominator, who is reminded that AfD is not for cleanup, and that "Nobody's working on it" is a argument to avoid. The Bushranger One ping only 00:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC) reply
90% of this article is unsubstantiated by reliable references. 50% of the article appears to be primary research. I edited it a little yesterday and received 6 disambiguation errors, not from edits I added. Probably this has occurred before to others, but no one bothered to fix them. Apparently this article is so bad everyone seems to be avoiding it, including me from now on. At my first attempt in July at fixing citations, I could resolve none of them. The primary editor assured me he could fix them, but since my first visit in July there have been zero edits by the primary. It needs a total rewrite, but it's not something I'm interested in doing. It's an embarrassment that should at least be hidden from public view, perhaps in AfC. :- ) Don 13:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC) reply