- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit 14:28, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Los Horcones
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Los Horcones ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Massive number of footnotes, but only one of them covers the subject directly in any detail. The article is full of excessive detail about Skinner's work, which allows for many more footnotes. This was previously proposed for deletion, or I would have gone that route. ~ T P W 14:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. ~ T P W 14:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit 14:28, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Los Horcones
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Los Horcones ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Massive number of footnotes, but only one of them covers the subject directly in any detail. The article is full of excessive detail about Skinner's work, which allows for many more footnotes. This was previously proposed for deletion, or I would have gone that route. ~ T P W 14:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. ~ T P W 14:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.