The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No indication of notability for the list as a subject.
RL0919 (
talk) 01:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge: to
ACM-W per nom. No need for this to be a standalone article.
Marquardtika (
talk) 22:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete I don't think a list of chapters would be appropriate in the main article either.
Reywas92Talk 22:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep as separate list. ACM is one of the premier world-wide computing organizations and ACM-W represents a substantial number of members in a large organization. Merging the list into the main ACM-W page would unnecessarily complicate the page. When reviewing [
reasons for deletion], it doesn't meet the criteria for deletion: Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page):
Files that are unused, obsolete, or violate the
non-free policy
Any other use of the
article,
template,
project, or
user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace
Any other content
not suitable for an encyclopedia
Merging growing lists into the main page would not clarify the information or make it more accessible. Instead, the list needs to be updated to include additional information about this notable organization. We could definitely use more help getting the article completed.
Cypherquest (
talk) 12:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Where is the independent evidence that these chapters are notable in their own right?
Rathfelder (
talk) 13:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:NOTDIR. All chapters appear non-notable therefore the article is not suitable for merging either.
Ajf773 (
talk) 20:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Remember
the policy: the notability of a list does not depend on the notability of each item of the list, rather, the set of items must meet the notability requirements. Thus, for this page to remain, we need significant coverage of the set of ACM-W chapters in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. However, outside of the organization's website and website's belonging to the individual chapters, I cannot find many sources. The few sources I can find
[1]
[2] speak more to the notability of the
ACM-W than of this list.
BenKuykendall (
talk) 22:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No indication of notability for the list as a subject.
RL0919 (
talk) 01:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge: to
ACM-W per nom. No need for this to be a standalone article.
Marquardtika (
talk) 22:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete I don't think a list of chapters would be appropriate in the main article either.
Reywas92Talk 22:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep as separate list. ACM is one of the premier world-wide computing organizations and ACM-W represents a substantial number of members in a large organization. Merging the list into the main ACM-W page would unnecessarily complicate the page. When reviewing [
reasons for deletion], it doesn't meet the criteria for deletion: Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page):
Files that are unused, obsolete, or violate the
non-free policy
Any other use of the
article,
template,
project, or
user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace
Any other content
not suitable for an encyclopedia
Merging growing lists into the main page would not clarify the information or make it more accessible. Instead, the list needs to be updated to include additional information about this notable organization. We could definitely use more help getting the article completed.
Cypherquest (
talk) 12:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Where is the independent evidence that these chapters are notable in their own right?
Rathfelder (
talk) 13:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:NOTDIR. All chapters appear non-notable therefore the article is not suitable for merging either.
Ajf773 (
talk) 20:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Remember
the policy: the notability of a list does not depend on the notability of each item of the list, rather, the set of items must meet the notability requirements. Thus, for this page to remain, we need significant coverage of the set of ACM-W chapters in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. However, outside of the organization's website and website's belonging to the individual chapters, I cannot find many sources. The few sources I can find
[1]
[2] speak more to the notability of the
ACM-W than of this list.
BenKuykendall (
talk) 22:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.