- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch ( talk) 01:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
LAX Automated People Mover
- LAX Automated People Mover ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is written as if this future transit project is definitely happening, when in reality, the project is still in the very early planning stages, making this article a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Very few reliable sources could be found that elaborate on the details of this project. While a transit system at LAX Airport is being planned, a people mover is only one of several proposed options, including a bus rapid transit line and various light rail routings. For now, any details about a future transit system should be in the airport's article only. – Dream out loud ( talk) 23:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree that it is way too soon to have an article about this proposal, which is still in the talking stages. [1] [2] -- MelanieN ( talk) 18:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch ( talk) 01:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
LAX Automated People Mover
- LAX Automated People Mover ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is written as if this future transit project is definitely happening, when in reality, the project is still in the very early planning stages, making this article a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Very few reliable sources could be found that elaborate on the details of this project. While a transit system at LAX Airport is being planned, a people mover is only one of several proposed options, including a bus rapid transit line and various light rail routings. For now, any details about a future transit system should be in the airport's article only. – Dream out loud ( talk) 23:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree that it is way too soon to have an article about this proposal, which is still in the talking stages. [1] [2] -- MelanieN ( talk) 18:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.