- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
K17MJ-D
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- K17MJ-D ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 19:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Texas. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 19:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete: It certainly appears to have more of a history than the average HC2/Innovate station, but we look for independent, significant coverage these days, in a way that we weren't doing so much in 2006. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)- Pivoting to a weak keep per the improvements mentioned below. Obviously I was more right than I thought about the "more history than other HC2/Innovate stations" thing! WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep You wouldn't have been able to find this on your own, but this station was the only UPN outlet in San Antonio between 1998 and 2000 and earned itself some SIGCOV that way. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Subject meets the WP:GNG with the sourcing from its pre-Innovate days. Notability isn't temporary. Let'srun ( talk) 00:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
K17MJ-D
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- K17MJ-D ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 19:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Texas. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 19:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete: It certainly appears to have more of a history than the average HC2/Innovate station, but we look for independent, significant coverage these days, in a way that we weren't doing so much in 2006. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)- Pivoting to a weak keep per the improvements mentioned below. Obviously I was more right than I thought about the "more history than other HC2/Innovate stations" thing! WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep You wouldn't have been able to find this on your own, but this station was the only UPN outlet in San Antonio between 1998 and 2000 and earned itself some SIGCOV that way. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Subject meets the WP:GNG with the sourcing from its pre-Innovate days. Notability isn't temporary. Let'srun ( talk) 00:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.