- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 13:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Haptic medicine
- Haptic medicine ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There appears to be only one reasonable source for this, PMID 1974549 making clear this is a novel concept. It therefore lacks coverage in RS (let alone WP:MEDRS) and so sourcing is insufficient for it to pass WP:GNG. Alexbrn ( talk) 09:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete (wasn't this sort of nonsense thoroughly debunked by a paper published by a child?) This article, per Alex, lacks RS and fails GNG. - Roxy the non edible dog™ ( resonate) 09:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable alt-med fluff. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 02:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Although there are numerous sources on the general topic of touch-based therapy a search shows that the term "haptic medicine" was coined by Cindy Mason at Stanford and is used by no one else. The article contains numerous references but only the one to Mason and Mason discusses "haptic medicine" per se. The conclusion thus is clear: delete per WP:NEOLOGISM. Short Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 02:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 13:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Haptic medicine
- Haptic medicine ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There appears to be only one reasonable source for this, PMID 1974549 making clear this is a novel concept. It therefore lacks coverage in RS (let alone WP:MEDRS) and so sourcing is insufficient for it to pass WP:GNG. Alexbrn ( talk) 09:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete (wasn't this sort of nonsense thoroughly debunked by a paper published by a child?) This article, per Alex, lacks RS and fails GNG. - Roxy the non edible dog™ ( resonate) 09:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable alt-med fluff. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 02:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Although there are numerous sources on the general topic of touch-based therapy a search shows that the term "haptic medicine" was coined by Cindy Mason at Stanford and is used by no one else. The article contains numerous references but only the one to Mason and Mason discusses "haptic medicine" per se. The conclusion thus is clear: delete per WP:NEOLOGISM. Short Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 02:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.