- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. The nomination is essentially only proposing a merge in stating, "this needs to be incorporated into one of the reparations articles ..." I suggest adding merge templates to the articles denoted and starting a discussion on a talk page. North America 1000 05:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Guarantees of non-repetition
- Guarantees of non-repetition ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This needs to be incorporated into one of the reparations articles (which probably need to be merged themselves. This isn't notable enough to warrant its own article. Pariah24 ( talk) 06:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) ( m) 05:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. The nomination is essentially only proposing a merge in stating, "this needs to be incorporated into one of the reparations articles ..." I suggest adding merge templates to the articles denoted and starting a discussion on a talk page. North America 1000 05:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Guarantees of non-repetition
- Guarantees of non-repetition ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This needs to be incorporated into one of the reparations articles (which probably need to be merged themselves. This isn't notable enough to warrant its own article. Pariah24 ( talk) 06:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) ( m) 05:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.