From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 05:58, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Gang Stalking Lawsuit

Gang Stalking Lawsuit (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not proven; appears to be one single court case, only a link to a listing of thousands of court cases (coverage on Pacer does not itself connote importance), and then a bunch of links to advocacy sites supporting one side of the "it's a real problem" vs. "it's a psychosis" side of the gangstalking debate. This appears to be a WP:Coatrack issue, something the gangstalking community has been very clearly pursuing on Wikipedia and advocating on their discussion sites despite a general lack of substantive coverage in reliable media for their cause. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 05:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k ( talk) 20:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • The National Center for Victims of Crime in Washington, D.C., the largest publicly funded victims' froup in the United States, is receiving thousands of calls every monthcomplaining of gang stalking from every state in the nation. Anyone can confirm this by calling 800-394-2255. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.223.132 ( talk) 20:56, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 72.89.223.132 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
  • Delete as yet another attempt in the long-running campaign to get an unnotable conspiracy theory into Wikipedia. This has gone on over several articles but much of the background can be found at Talk:Stalking, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gang stalking and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cause stalking. Phil Bridger ( talk) 21:06, 8 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The importance of this lawsuit is not demonstrated, and nothing can be found about it in a search. Most of the article attempts, unsuccessfully, to establish the existence of "gang stalking" or "gangstalking", but the term is not supported by Reliable Sources and is not used by most of the references in the article. -- MelanieN ( talk) 21:13, 8 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 05:58, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Gang Stalking Lawsuit

Gang Stalking Lawsuit (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not proven; appears to be one single court case, only a link to a listing of thousands of court cases (coverage on Pacer does not itself connote importance), and then a bunch of links to advocacy sites supporting one side of the "it's a real problem" vs. "it's a psychosis" side of the gangstalking debate. This appears to be a WP:Coatrack issue, something the gangstalking community has been very clearly pursuing on Wikipedia and advocating on their discussion sites despite a general lack of substantive coverage in reliable media for their cause. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 05:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k ( talk) 20:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • The National Center for Victims of Crime in Washington, D.C., the largest publicly funded victims' froup in the United States, is receiving thousands of calls every monthcomplaining of gang stalking from every state in the nation. Anyone can confirm this by calling 800-394-2255. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.223.132 ( talk) 20:56, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 72.89.223.132 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
  • Delete as yet another attempt in the long-running campaign to get an unnotable conspiracy theory into Wikipedia. This has gone on over several articles but much of the background can be found at Talk:Stalking, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gang stalking and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cause stalking. Phil Bridger ( talk) 21:06, 8 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The importance of this lawsuit is not demonstrated, and nothing can be found about it in a search. Most of the article attempts, unsuccessfully, to establish the existence of "gang stalking" or "gangstalking", but the term is not supported by Reliable Sources and is not used by most of the references in the article. -- MelanieN ( talk) 21:13, 8 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook