The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete The library's website says it hasn't been a church since 1964 and they added/expanded the building. I don't think it's on the NRHP, so you likely won't find online sources talking about the building.
Oaktree b (
talk) 23:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. No independent RS coverage found to distinguish this building, historic or otherwise. The subject is church building that was repurposed as a public library. Its history in either function is not exceptionally long nor independently noted. The page is in the NRHP project because it was initially created with now-removed unverifiable NRHP statements.
• Gene93k (
talk) 10:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete The library's website says it hasn't been a church since 1964 and they added/expanded the building. I don't think it's on the NRHP, so you likely won't find online sources talking about the building.
Oaktree b (
talk) 23:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. No independent RS coverage found to distinguish this building, historic or otherwise. The subject is church building that was repurposed as a public library. Its history in either function is not exceptionally long nor independently noted. The page is in the NRHP project because it was initially created with now-removed unverifiable NRHP statements.
• Gene93k (
talk) 10:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.