- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Faithbooking
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Faithbooking ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are 3 citations on this article:
- A book titled "The therapist's notebook for integrating spirituality in counseling". This looks like a very serious book, and I think it is, but according to google books it contains the word "faithbook" nowhere.
- I can't find a copy of "100 Creative Activities for Sabbath" but it was written by an author who seems to churn out list-of-activity books. Doesn't seem particularly reliable.
- I also can't find a copy of Pages of Faith: The Art of Spiritual Scrapbooking where this neologism no doubt originates, but this article also seems to have been created pretty shortly after the book was published.
In summary, I think this fails WP:NOTNEO BrigadierG ( talk) 17:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete -- per nom. No RS discuss this term, only random blogs. NOTNEO is exactly the right reason to deep six this fluff. Central and Adams ( talk) 20:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with both of the above, and the article is furthermore loaded with WP:OR. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 20:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 23:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I tend toward inclusionism and even I can't find a shred of reason for this article to exist. It ticks boxes for all the greatest hits: NN, NEO, OR and maybe PROMO. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 18:15, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Devoke water 10:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Faithbooking
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Faithbooking ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are 3 citations on this article:
- A book titled "The therapist's notebook for integrating spirituality in counseling". This looks like a very serious book, and I think it is, but according to google books it contains the word "faithbook" nowhere.
- I can't find a copy of "100 Creative Activities for Sabbath" but it was written by an author who seems to churn out list-of-activity books. Doesn't seem particularly reliable.
- I also can't find a copy of Pages of Faith: The Art of Spiritual Scrapbooking where this neologism no doubt originates, but this article also seems to have been created pretty shortly after the book was published.
In summary, I think this fails WP:NOTNEO BrigadierG ( talk) 17:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete -- per nom. No RS discuss this term, only random blogs. NOTNEO is exactly the right reason to deep six this fluff. Central and Adams ( talk) 20:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with both of the above, and the article is furthermore loaded with WP:OR. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 20:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 23:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I tend toward inclusionism and even I can't find a shred of reason for this article to exist. It ticks boxes for all the greatest hits: NN, NEO, OR and maybe PROMO. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 18:15, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Devoke water 10:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.