From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW keep. There seems to be unanimous agreement that this is a notable streamer. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 09:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Disguised Toast

Disguised Toast (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet the notability guidelines. This article had stated no reason for creation on its talk page even when the discussion was ongoing. The only sliver of notability I could think of could have been for the award nomination the subject was up for, however, he was only nominated and didn't win it. There was no notability prior to this event as he was a moderate streamer back in the day and was growing at a usual rate. Delta fiver ( talk) , 08:01 ,23 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 08:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 08:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Added some references-- it seems that the subject passes WP:GNG, considering the large number of secondary sources discussing him. Gilded Snail ( talk) 16:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, Gilded Snail has added some good references to at least leave open the argument that the topic is notable. Some nice coverage of a controversy, so not all fluff. OhioShmyo ( talk) 22:17, 23 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: WP:RS is present to pass WP:GNG. Meeanaya ( talk) 05:49, 24 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: they are notable and have significant independent media coverage. a simple google search gives a nice list of sources here: https://www.esportspedia.com/streamers/Disguised_Toast#Interviews_and_Articles Grumpig ( talk) 05:43, 25 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: More substantial information and edits have been done to give notability, the article is better of being kept. Delta fiver ( talk) (UTC) 19:37, 29 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW keep. There seems to be unanimous agreement that this is a notable streamer. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 09:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Disguised Toast

Disguised Toast (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet the notability guidelines. This article had stated no reason for creation on its talk page even when the discussion was ongoing. The only sliver of notability I could think of could have been for the award nomination the subject was up for, however, he was only nominated and didn't win it. There was no notability prior to this event as he was a moderate streamer back in the day and was growing at a usual rate. Delta fiver ( talk) , 08:01 ,23 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 08:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 08:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Added some references-- it seems that the subject passes WP:GNG, considering the large number of secondary sources discussing him. Gilded Snail ( talk) 16:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, Gilded Snail has added some good references to at least leave open the argument that the topic is notable. Some nice coverage of a controversy, so not all fluff. OhioShmyo ( talk) 22:17, 23 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: WP:RS is present to pass WP:GNG. Meeanaya ( talk) 05:49, 24 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: they are notable and have significant independent media coverage. a simple google search gives a nice list of sources here: https://www.esportspedia.com/streamers/Disguised_Toast#Interviews_and_Articles Grumpig ( talk) 05:43, 25 July 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: More substantial information and edits have been done to give notability, the article is better of being kept. Delta fiver ( talk) (UTC) 19:37, 29 July 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook