- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 ( HAPPY 2023) 15:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Danish Association of Chartered Surveyors
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Danish Association of Chartered Surveyors ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources found online, fails WP:GNG TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 00:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Denmark. Shellwood ( talk) 00:20, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep A quick Google shows some sources in Danish, including academic sources. I think this article should be improved, rather than deleted. QuintinK ( talk) 02:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 01:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Weak keep, if no work has been done, it may not be done for some time. Someone should translate and get to work sourcing, if not, delete if we can't find more. Weak keep for now. — Moops ⋠ T⋡ 06:40, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Delete, There is no significant coverage, even in Danish. There are only one-line mentions in articles about something else. BruceThomson ( talk) 05:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since there have been no additions to the article, if you know of sources to address the nominator's statement, please mention them here instead of just saying they exist in a Google search.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 ( HAPPY 2023) 15:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Danish Association of Chartered Surveyors
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Danish Association of Chartered Surveyors ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources found online, fails WP:GNG TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 00:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Denmark. Shellwood ( talk) 00:20, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep A quick Google shows some sources in Danish, including academic sources. I think this article should be improved, rather than deleted. QuintinK ( talk) 02:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 01:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Weak keep, if no work has been done, it may not be done for some time. Someone should translate and get to work sourcing, if not, delete if we can't find more. Weak keep for now. — Moops ⋠ T⋡ 06:40, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Delete, There is no significant coverage, even in Danish. There are only one-line mentions in articles about something else. BruceThomson ( talk) 05:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since there have been no additions to the article, if you know of sources to address the nominator's statement, please mention them here instead of just saying they exist in a Google search.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.