The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (soft)
slakr\
talk / 08:34, 20 September 2014 (UTC)reply
nonnotable air gun model, no refs found discussing it. a redirect to Daisy may be acceptable, if it is mentioned there.
Mercurywoodrose (
talk) 17:55, 24 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 02:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 21:28, 8 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Go ahead and delete - It's not a terrible article but there's not much and I don't think redirecting is an option since it is not mentioned at the company's page and multiple searches failed to yield something significant.
SwisterTwistertalk 03:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (soft)
slakr\
talk / 08:34, 20 September 2014 (UTC)reply
nonnotable air gun model, no refs found discussing it. a redirect to Daisy may be acceptable, if it is mentioned there.
Mercurywoodrose (
talk) 17:55, 24 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 02:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 21:28, 8 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Go ahead and delete - It's not a terrible article but there's not much and I don't think redirecting is an option since it is not mentioned at the company's page and multiple searches failed to yield something significant.
SwisterTwistertalk 03:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.