From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America 1000 00:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Continuum (design consultancy)

Continuum (design consultancy) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The whole article is mere a corporate Profile, presenting few known things as mere associations nothing else. notability and significant ground are not present. Light2021 ( talk) 18:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC) reply

  • delete fails WP:CORP. I cannot believe such a promo piece exists for almost 14 years and since then google news is well developed. Found no significant coverage in gnews. LibStar ( talk) 18:21, 28 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America 1000 00:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Continuum (design consultancy)

Continuum (design consultancy) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The whole article is mere a corporate Profile, presenting few known things as mere associations nothing else. notability and significant ground are not present. Light2021 ( talk) 18:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC) reply

  • delete fails WP:CORP. I cannot believe such a promo piece exists for almost 14 years and since then google news is well developed. Found no significant coverage in gnews. LibStar ( talk) 18:21, 28 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook