From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Douglas Bruce. Suitable content can be merged from history if desired. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:18, 1 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Colorado House career of Douglas Bruce

Colorado House career of Douglas Bruce (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has to be one of the strangest articles I've ever come across. I've never encountered an article this bloated in concept and scope, essentially a massive WP:CSECTION/ WP:CONTENTFORK hybrid. This material is anything but encyclopedic. KidAdSPEAK 08:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, per nomination. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 10:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC). reply
  • Delete per nom and redirect to Douglas Bruce. I did get a good laugh out of the sheer audacity of this lengthy article on a single term of service by a state legislator. BD2412 T 16:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete/Merge into article of Douglas Bruce. This is a giant content fork, I can hardly imagine a situation where a state rep would be deserving of an article devoted entirely to their legislative career, as if the parent article couldn't fit it. - Indy beetle ( talk) 23:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete/Merge Agree with the other comments. This absolutely does not belong as it’s own article. The question is what to do with the information contained in it. Much of it probably fails the noteworthy test, but if a consensus develops around keeping some of it, any material from the article deemed useful should be merged into the Douglas Bruce individual page. Go4thProsper ( talk) 02:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom and redirect to Douglas Bruce.-- Greysonsarch ( talk) 14:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Douglas Bruce. Suitable content can be merged from history if desired. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:18, 1 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Colorado House career of Douglas Bruce

Colorado House career of Douglas Bruce (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has to be one of the strangest articles I've ever come across. I've never encountered an article this bloated in concept and scope, essentially a massive WP:CSECTION/ WP:CONTENTFORK hybrid. This material is anything but encyclopedic. KidAdSPEAK 08:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, per nomination. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 10:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC). reply
  • Delete per nom and redirect to Douglas Bruce. I did get a good laugh out of the sheer audacity of this lengthy article on a single term of service by a state legislator. BD2412 T 16:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete/Merge into article of Douglas Bruce. This is a giant content fork, I can hardly imagine a situation where a state rep would be deserving of an article devoted entirely to their legislative career, as if the parent article couldn't fit it. - Indy beetle ( talk) 23:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete/Merge Agree with the other comments. This absolutely does not belong as it’s own article. The question is what to do with the information contained in it. Much of it probably fails the noteworthy test, but if a consensus develops around keeping some of it, any material from the article deemed useful should be merged into the Douglas Bruce individual page. Go4thProsper ( talk) 02:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom and redirect to Douglas Bruce.-- Greysonsarch ( talk) 14:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook