The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Douglas Bruce. Suitable content can be merged from history if desired.
Eddie891TalkWork 14:18, 1 April 2021 (UTC)reply
This has to be one of the strangest articles I've ever come across. I've never encountered an article this bloated in concept and scope, essentially a massive
WP:CSECTION/
WP:CONTENTFORK hybrid. This material is anything but encyclopedic.
KidAd •
SPEAK 08:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and redirect to
Douglas Bruce. I did get a good laugh out of the sheer audacity of this lengthy article on a single term of service by a state legislator.
BD2412T 16:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete/Merge into article of Douglas Bruce. This is a giant content fork, I can hardly imagine a situation where a state rep would be deserving of an article devoted entirely to their legislative career, as if the parent article couldn't fit it. -
Indy beetle (
talk) 23:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete/Merge Agree with the other comments. This absolutely does not belong as it’s own article. The question is what to do with the information contained in it. Much of it probably fails the noteworthy test, but if a consensus develops around keeping some of it, any material from the article deemed useful should be merged into the Douglas Bruce individual page.
Go4thProsper (
talk) 02:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Douglas Bruce. Suitable content can be merged from history if desired.
Eddie891TalkWork 14:18, 1 April 2021 (UTC)reply
This has to be one of the strangest articles I've ever come across. I've never encountered an article this bloated in concept and scope, essentially a massive
WP:CSECTION/
WP:CONTENTFORK hybrid. This material is anything but encyclopedic.
KidAd •
SPEAK 08:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and redirect to
Douglas Bruce. I did get a good laugh out of the sheer audacity of this lengthy article on a single term of service by a state legislator.
BD2412T 16:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete/Merge into article of Douglas Bruce. This is a giant content fork, I can hardly imagine a situation where a state rep would be deserving of an article devoted entirely to their legislative career, as if the parent article couldn't fit it. -
Indy beetle (
talk) 23:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete/Merge Agree with the other comments. This absolutely does not belong as it’s own article. The question is what to do with the information contained in it. Much of it probably fails the noteworthy test, but if a consensus develops around keeping some of it, any material from the article deemed useful should be merged into the Douglas Bruce individual page.
Go4thProsper (
talk) 02:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.