- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 22:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Chua Chwee Koh
- Chua Chwee Koh ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Brigadier-Generals are ranked below Major generals and Lieutenant generals in the Singapore Armed Forces. The creator seems to have created a lot of articles pertaining to University of Birmingham people, most of which seem to make the grade of notability, but this one i'm not convinced about. Seems more like padding. Uhooep ( talk) 11:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. "Brigadier-Generals are ranked below Major generals and Lieutenant generals" in all armed forces that have them! However, they are still general officers and thus clearly still meet the provisions of WP:SOLDIER, which does not specify which grades of general are or are not notable. We also hold that brigadiers (without the general bit) are notable and have done so at many AfDs. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:43, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 22:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Chua Chwee Koh
- Chua Chwee Koh ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Brigadier-Generals are ranked below Major generals and Lieutenant generals in the Singapore Armed Forces. The creator seems to have created a lot of articles pertaining to University of Birmingham people, most of which seem to make the grade of notability, but this one i'm not convinced about. Seems more like padding. Uhooep ( talk) 11:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. "Brigadier-Generals are ranked below Major generals and Lieutenant generals" in all armed forces that have them! However, they are still general officers and thus clearly still meet the provisions of WP:SOLDIER, which does not specify which grades of general are or are not notable. We also hold that brigadiers (without the general bit) are notable and have done so at many AfDs. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:43, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.