The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
WP:NFRINGE applies here and, unfortunately, I think this article clearly fails. The one mainstream sources is an instance from a "News of the Weird"-type article in the Chinese sensationalist press. Simply not notable enough for an article because
independent sources commenting on this "incident" are not forthcoming.
jps (
talk) 18:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable. Someone found a box and they aren't sure what it is.
Bhny (
talk) 19:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Just when I think ufology can't get any more untrustworthy, up bubbles this bit of
fakelore, oft repeated on fringe forums and conspiracy sites, but ultimately untraceable to any reliable source. -
LuckyLouie (
talk) 21:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Per nomination. Lack of reliable sources. --
Jersey92 (
talk) 04:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable fringe event. Andrew327 06:07, 29 May 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
WP:NFRINGE applies here and, unfortunately, I think this article clearly fails. The one mainstream sources is an instance from a "News of the Weird"-type article in the Chinese sensationalist press. Simply not notable enough for an article because
independent sources commenting on this "incident" are not forthcoming.
jps (
talk) 18:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Not notable. Someone found a box and they aren't sure what it is.
Bhny (
talk) 19:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Just when I think ufology can't get any more untrustworthy, up bubbles this bit of
fakelore, oft repeated on fringe forums and conspiracy sites, but ultimately untraceable to any reliable source. -
LuckyLouie (
talk) 21:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Per nomination. Lack of reliable sources. --
Jersey92 (
talk) 04:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable fringe event. Andrew327 06:07, 29 May 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.