- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me know or make a request at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 20:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Chak No.15/GD
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chak No.15/GD ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Non-notable village. Sources fail to provide any context whatsoever, and only show a list of numerous villages. No evidence that a standalone article is needed. CycloneYoris talk! 19:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CycloneYoris talk! 19:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per
WP:POPULATED which states
Census tracts, abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable.
--— Saqib ( talk | contribs) 19:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) - Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:GEOLAND - it is a populated place and is also a union council [1]. 103.126.219.248 ( talk) 00:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- That source is actually the same one that was added to the article. Only shows an extensive list of villages without providing context on any of them. CycloneYoris talk! 02:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete or Draftify it does appear to exist per google and bing maps @ 30°57'58.3"N 73°28'00.7"E (also several roads confusingly all labeled "Chak Number 15/GD Rd"). It has quite a few buildings including a mosque and two schools so possible is notable per WP:GEOLAND. However the first source does not mention and the second says "CHAK 15/1R" not "CHAK 15/GD" so effectively unsourced. KylieTastic ( talk) 15:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)- Delete per nom Okmrman ( talk) 04:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me know or make a request at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 20:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Chak No.15/GD
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chak No.15/GD ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Non-notable village. Sources fail to provide any context whatsoever, and only show a list of numerous villages. No evidence that a standalone article is needed. CycloneYoris talk! 19:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CycloneYoris talk! 19:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per
WP:POPULATED which states
Census tracts, abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable.
--— Saqib ( talk | contribs) 19:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) - Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:GEOLAND - it is a populated place and is also a union council [1]. 103.126.219.248 ( talk) 00:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- That source is actually the same one that was added to the article. Only shows an extensive list of villages without providing context on any of them. CycloneYoris talk! 02:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete or Draftify it does appear to exist per google and bing maps @ 30°57'58.3"N 73°28'00.7"E (also several roads confusingly all labeled "Chak Number 15/GD Rd"). It has quite a few buildings including a mosque and two schools so possible is notable per WP:GEOLAND. However the first source does not mention and the second says "CHAK 15/1R" not "CHAK 15/GD" so effectively unsourced. KylieTastic ( talk) 15:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)- Delete per nom Okmrman ( talk) 04:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.