The result of the debate was - keep. Tom e r talk 07:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete
The "Commission" which is the topic of this page is not notable and does not rise to Wikipedia's standard for acceptability. This "commission" has no more credibility than a mock trial conducted in a law school class, or even in a high school social studies class.
The "indictments" hold no weight, and the supposed court has no jurisdiction to act on its "findings"
Many of the criticisms mentioned in the article are already raised in their respective articles about the specific issues.
Much of the rest of the article is filled with original research that is not cited.
A mention of this "tribunal" may be warranted under the listed sponsor Not In Our Name, but the Commission itself is not notable enough for its own article. RWR8189 08:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was - keep. Tom e r talk 07:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete
The "Commission" which is the topic of this page is not notable and does not rise to Wikipedia's standard for acceptability. This "commission" has no more credibility than a mock trial conducted in a law school class, or even in a high school social studies class.
The "indictments" hold no weight, and the supposed court has no jurisdiction to act on its "findings"
Many of the criticisms mentioned in the article are already raised in their respective articles about the specific issues.
Much of the rest of the article is filled with original research that is not cited.
A mention of this "tribunal" may be warranted under the listed sponsor Not In Our Name, but the Commission itself is not notable enough for its own article. RWR8189 08:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC) reply