The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (
talk) 00:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)reply
Non-notable, recent organization. Sources do not actually discuss the organization. MBisanztalk 03:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete Nothing shows the organization is notable. Most of the article talks about the issue they are concerned with, hence
WP:Coatrack.
Kitfoxxe (
talk) 04:15, 29 April 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (
talk) 00:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)reply
Non-notable, recent organization. Sources do not actually discuss the organization. MBisanztalk 03:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete Nothing shows the organization is notable. Most of the article talks about the issue they are concerned with, hence
WP:Coatrack.
Kitfoxxe (
talk) 04:15, 29 April 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.