The result was withdrawn by nominator on my talk page. Why that was done on my talk page, and not here, I don't know. The article does need some clean-up. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 09:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Audicom is a software product advertisement masquerading as an encyclopedic article and violates WP:NOTABILITY and WP:SPAM. Same WP:V and WP:PRODUCT issues to delete are found here as in Audicom (PC audio cards). What troubles me the most is the blatant spam on so many audio pages. This is just one diff example of the many I continue to find. Users on this discussion have called me "an edit warrior" "feuding editor", yet, they completely ignore the scope of these individuals' self promotion activities at Wikipedia. One quick look at OscarJuan and Sebastian Ledesma's contributions confirms it. To make things more difficult to understand, there is clear evidence of sock and meat puppet activity. Jrod2 ( talk) 17:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC) reply
I didn't make an article about the company (wich is near 40 years old in the broadcast market) because I considered that it can be considerd self promoting. But what the company did, it's a merit: a working compression system.
How many companies in the world create a compression system?
It's an offence that an small company from Argentina did it?.
I didn't make an article about other products (like digital audio processors, or digital consoles) that the company currently sells. So, it's not spam.
The company name it's Solidyne. The system name was Audicom. That's clarifies the doubts for the user JRod2.
And by last, but not least, it's AUDICOM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SLedesma ( talk • contribs) 18:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn by nominator on my talk page. Why that was done on my talk page, and not here, I don't know. The article does need some clean-up. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 09:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Audicom is a software product advertisement masquerading as an encyclopedic article and violates WP:NOTABILITY and WP:SPAM. Same WP:V and WP:PRODUCT issues to delete are found here as in Audicom (PC audio cards). What troubles me the most is the blatant spam on so many audio pages. This is just one diff example of the many I continue to find. Users on this discussion have called me "an edit warrior" "feuding editor", yet, they completely ignore the scope of these individuals' self promotion activities at Wikipedia. One quick look at OscarJuan and Sebastian Ledesma's contributions confirms it. To make things more difficult to understand, there is clear evidence of sock and meat puppet activity. Jrod2 ( talk) 17:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC) reply
I didn't make an article about the company (wich is near 40 years old in the broadcast market) because I considered that it can be considerd self promoting. But what the company did, it's a merit: a working compression system.
How many companies in the world create a compression system?
It's an offence that an small company from Argentina did it?.
I didn't make an article about other products (like digital audio processors, or digital consoles) that the company currently sells. So, it's not spam.
The company name it's Solidyne. The system name was Audicom. That's clarifies the doubts for the user JRod2.
And by last, but not least, it's AUDICOM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SLedesma ( talk • contribs) 18:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC) reply