From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETEish given the low input. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Association of Emergency Physicians

Association of Emergency Physicians (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct organization; their official page no longer loads. Can't find any official site for the organization searching by name, or previous contact information (like phone number). No third-party references were provided originally, and none are found at this time. Mikeblas ( talk) 13:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: this book briefly mentions the association, saying that it "has not gained any measure of political power or influence in organized medicine", so I'd say not notable (although that is more in the real-life sense of the word). -- HyperGaruda ( talk) 07:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETEish given the low input. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Association of Emergency Physicians

Association of Emergency Physicians (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct organization; their official page no longer loads. Can't find any official site for the organization searching by name, or previous contact information (like phone number). No third-party references were provided originally, and none are found at this time. Mikeblas ( talk) 13:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: this book briefly mentions the association, saying that it "has not gained any measure of political power or influence in organized medicine", so I'd say not notable (although that is more in the real-life sense of the word). -- HyperGaruda ( talk) 07:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook