This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 April 16. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was merge to Rachel Corrie#Reactions. MBisanz talk 06:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC) reply
I know I'm going to get it for this but in short, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Rachel Corrie is notable, some of the tributes to her are notable, but anything more than a few paragraphs like at Rachel_Corrie#Artistic_tributes seems excessive. Not every tribute nor is the concept of tributes to her notable. I see that Talk:Rachel Corrie has some discussion about this split but I really don't see the need for this article at all, not even a merge. Ricky81682 ( talk) 08:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 April 16. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was merge to Rachel Corrie#Reactions. MBisanz talk 06:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC) reply
I know I'm going to get it for this but in short, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Rachel Corrie is notable, some of the tributes to her are notable, but anything more than a few paragraphs like at Rachel_Corrie#Artistic_tributes seems excessive. Not every tribute nor is the concept of tributes to her notable. I see that Talk:Rachel Corrie has some discussion about this split but I really don't see the need for this article at all, not even a merge. Ricky81682 ( talk) 08:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC) reply