The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
j⚛e deckertalk 00:44, 30 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Some of the academic sources that takes his theory and use it are:
Mureika, J. R., G. C. Cupchik, and C. C. Dyer. "Multifractal fingerprints in the visual arts." Leonardo 37.1 (2004): 53-56.
Mureika, J. R., C. C. Dyer, and G. C. Cupchik. "Multifractal structure in nonrepresentational art." Physical Review E 72.4 (2005): 046101.
Priday, Hamilton. Seizing the Essence Hamilton Priday. 2008.
Alexenberg, Mel. The Future of Art in a Postdigital Age: From Hellenistic to Hebraic Consciousness (Bristol and Chicago: Intellect Books/University of Chicago Press, 2011).
Tzahy (
talk) 04:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC))reply
John A. Walker, one of the most important art critics wrote about the book: "If Avital's diagnosis of art's illness and his proposed cure are correct, then this is a highly important volume." (The Art Book 25-26, Volume 12 Issue 2, May 2005)
Tzahy (
talk) 03:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar
♔ 00:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep since sources seem to be available.
ImprovingWiki (
talk) 23:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
j⚛e deckertalk 00:44, 30 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Some of the academic sources that takes his theory and use it are:
Mureika, J. R., G. C. Cupchik, and C. C. Dyer. "Multifractal fingerprints in the visual arts." Leonardo 37.1 (2004): 53-56.
Mureika, J. R., C. C. Dyer, and G. C. Cupchik. "Multifractal structure in nonrepresentational art." Physical Review E 72.4 (2005): 046101.
Priday, Hamilton. Seizing the Essence Hamilton Priday. 2008.
Alexenberg, Mel. The Future of Art in a Postdigital Age: From Hellenistic to Hebraic Consciousness (Bristol and Chicago: Intellect Books/University of Chicago Press, 2011).
Tzahy (
talk) 04:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC))reply
John A. Walker, one of the most important art critics wrote about the book: "If Avital's diagnosis of art's illness and his proposed cure are correct, then this is a highly important volume." (The Art Book 25-26, Volume 12 Issue 2, May 2005)
Tzahy (
talk) 03:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar
♔ 00:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep since sources seem to be available.
ImprovingWiki (
talk) 23:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.