The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus to keep, especially after a mass of sourcing was found by
Reywas92TalkJoyous! |
Talk 20:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
No indication of notability, probably nigh on impossible to find sufficient sources to expand this article.
Mattdaviesfsic (
talk) 18:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)reply
delete One sentence description followed by examples which are too obvious as to require explanation. And for that matter, the term is too obvious for explanation.
Mangoe (
talk) 00:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Plenty of coverage around specific chimes as well as some that compare those of various cities. Plenty to work with. SounderBruce 09:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, I'm not going to look for the source right now, but at the time this was a prod I found a paper researching how different chime combinations could impart immediate ideas to their audience. For instance to differentiate between routine announcements, warnings, and emergencies. There's certainly an encyclopaedic subject here, it's just waiting for an editor with the enthusiasm to research it.
SpinningSpark 16:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Conditional keep per
WP:HEY,
IFF if the sources found are added to the article; otherwise, draftify.
Bearian (
talk) 02:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Due to the sources found by Reywas92.
MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus to keep, especially after a mass of sourcing was found by
Reywas92TalkJoyous! |
Talk 20:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
No indication of notability, probably nigh on impossible to find sufficient sources to expand this article.
Mattdaviesfsic (
talk) 18:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)reply
delete One sentence description followed by examples which are too obvious as to require explanation. And for that matter, the term is too obvious for explanation.
Mangoe (
talk) 00:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Plenty of coverage around specific chimes as well as some that compare those of various cities. Plenty to work with. SounderBruce 09:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, I'm not going to look for the source right now, but at the time this was a prod I found a paper researching how different chime combinations could impart immediate ideas to their audience. For instance to differentiate between routine announcements, warnings, and emergencies. There's certainly an encyclopaedic subject here, it's just waiting for an editor with the enthusiasm to research it.
SpinningSpark 16:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Conditional keep per
WP:HEY,
IFF if the sources found are added to the article; otherwise, draftify.
Bearian (
talk) 02:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Due to the sources found by Reywas92.
MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.