The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 11:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win, but the only other attempted claim of preexisting notability here, being state-level vice-president of his political party, is not a notability freebie in the absence of a
WP:GNG-worthy volume of
reliable source coverage about his work either. And the only footnote here is covering him in the context of being charged with, but not verifiably convicted of, a crime, which is (a) not grounds for notability either, per
WP:PERP, and (b) not enough coverage to get him over GNG all by itself even if it wasn't posing a PERP issue.
Bearcat (
talk) 11:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 11:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win, but the only other attempted claim of preexisting notability here, being state-level vice-president of his political party, is not a notability freebie in the absence of a
WP:GNG-worthy volume of
reliable source coverage about his work either. And the only footnote here is covering him in the context of being charged with, but not verifiably convicted of, a crime, which is (a) not grounds for notability either, per
WP:PERP, and (b) not enough coverage to get him over GNG all by itself even if it wasn't posing a PERP issue.
Bearcat (
talk) 11:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.