The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doesnt appear to be particularly noteworthy, a crash of non-commercial aircraft are rarely notable and not that uncommon. It really needs to kill somebody with a wikipedia article or hit something of note or cause a significant change in rules. Prod removed with a claim that the article is referenced, being referenced doesnt make it notable.
MilborneOne (
talk) 16:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)reply
leaning delete Searching for this is a real pain but there's no evidence that this was more than, well, akin to a fatal traffic accident.
Mangoe (
talk) 16:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per above and per
WP:AIRCRASH, which suggests that crashes of this type might be included in lists within articles on the (civil) aircraft or the airline. We don't have an article on the airline, and the aircraft is a converted military plane so there's no list there either.
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 20:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Don't know how often the creator of an article actually agrees with a potential deletion to the point they vote in favor of it, it's certainly my first time, but I'm struggling to find anything I can use to try to beef up noteworthiness. I didn't even know about it until I stumbled upon the final report while looking for an update on a more recent aircraft crash in the area. Chalk this one up to the good idea fairy giving me bad advice.
RGFI (
talk) 04:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doesnt appear to be particularly noteworthy, a crash of non-commercial aircraft are rarely notable and not that uncommon. It really needs to kill somebody with a wikipedia article or hit something of note or cause a significant change in rules. Prod removed with a claim that the article is referenced, being referenced doesnt make it notable.
MilborneOne (
talk) 16:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)reply
leaning delete Searching for this is a real pain but there's no evidence that this was more than, well, akin to a fatal traffic accident.
Mangoe (
talk) 16:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per above and per
WP:AIRCRASH, which suggests that crashes of this type might be included in lists within articles on the (civil) aircraft or the airline. We don't have an article on the airline, and the aircraft is a converted military plane so there's no list there either.
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 20:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Don't know how often the creator of an article actually agrees with a potential deletion to the point they vote in favor of it, it's certainly my first time, but I'm struggling to find anything I can use to try to beef up noteworthiness. I didn't even know about it until I stumbled upon the final report while looking for an update on a more recent aircraft crash in the area. Chalk this one up to the good idea fairy giving me bad advice.
RGFI (
talk) 04:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.