The
Arbitration Committee opened no cases this week, and closed one, leaving a total of five cases open.
Evidence phase
SemBubenny: A case about the communication behavior of
SemBubenny (formerly Mikkalai), and his use of administrator tools in disputed deletions.
Ayn Rand: A case about editorial behavior, such as alleged POV-pushing and bad faith, in relation to the
Ayn Rand article. The Arbitration Committee accepted the case as they found that all other avenues of dispute resolution had failed to resolve the dispute.
Date delinking: A case regarding the behavior of editors in the ongoing dispute relating to policy on linking dates in articles. An
injunction has been issued prohibiting large-scale linking or delinking of dates until the case is resolved.
Fringe science: A case initially filed about the behavior of
ScienceApologist, but opened to look at editing in the entire area of fringe science, and the behavior of editors who are involved in the area of dispute. In a proposed decision now being voted on by arbitrators,
Coren has proposed the creation of a new type of arbitration remedy, "supervised editing", which an editor may be placed under when he or she does not "engage other editors or the editorial process appropriately". A designated supervisor would be permitted to revert or refactor the edits of the other editor at his or her discretion, ban the editor from articles, or require that the editor propose any substantial content edits to the supervisor, who will make the edits on his behalf. After the period of supervision terminates, the supervisor will submit a report to the committee who will revise the remedy that placed the editor under supervision. Other remedies include placing
ScienceApologist under such supervision, restricting
Martinphi from editing policy and guideline pages, admonishing
Pcarbonn, and issuing general warnings to behave and seek mediation. Arbitrator voting is in progress.
Closed
PHG: A case brought by
PHG, in a follow-up to a prior case against PHG,
Franco-Mongol alliance. PHG's existing topic ban was narrowed in scope and, as narrowed, was extended until one year from the date of the decision.
The
Arbitration Committee opened no cases this week, and closed one, leaving a total of five cases open.
Evidence phase
SemBubenny: A case about the communication behavior of
SemBubenny (formerly Mikkalai), and his use of administrator tools in disputed deletions.
Ayn Rand: A case about editorial behavior, such as alleged POV-pushing and bad faith, in relation to the
Ayn Rand article. The Arbitration Committee accepted the case as they found that all other avenues of dispute resolution had failed to resolve the dispute.
Date delinking: A case regarding the behavior of editors in the ongoing dispute relating to policy on linking dates in articles. An
injunction has been issued prohibiting large-scale linking or delinking of dates until the case is resolved.
Fringe science: A case initially filed about the behavior of
ScienceApologist, but opened to look at editing in the entire area of fringe science, and the behavior of editors who are involved in the area of dispute. In a proposed decision now being voted on by arbitrators,
Coren has proposed the creation of a new type of arbitration remedy, "supervised editing", which an editor may be placed under when he or she does not "engage other editors or the editorial process appropriately". A designated supervisor would be permitted to revert or refactor the edits of the other editor at his or her discretion, ban the editor from articles, or require that the editor propose any substantial content edits to the supervisor, who will make the edits on his behalf. After the period of supervision terminates, the supervisor will submit a report to the committee who will revise the remedy that placed the editor under supervision. Other remedies include placing
ScienceApologist under such supervision, restricting
Martinphi from editing policy and guideline pages, admonishing
Pcarbonn, and issuing general warnings to behave and seek mediation. Arbitrator voting is in progress.
Closed
PHG: A case brought by
PHG, in a follow-up to a prior case against PHG,
Franco-Mongol alliance. PHG's existing topic ban was narrowed in scope and, as narrowed, was extended until one year from the date of the decision.
Discuss this story