The article seems to have come a long way and is nearing the criteria for featured status, but before proceeding with the nomination, there are a few things that need to be taken care of. First on my agenda is the article's locations section. As of now, the section is a stub, but I'm not certain if such a section is necessary. If it is, I will be happy to contribute to it, but if it's not, I would prefer not to spend my time and effort on it. The second main thing that I can think of that needs to be done is a general proofread of the article for the purpose of detecting uncited, poorly-worded, or unnecessary pieces of text. I would like to hear feedback this as well as any other ideas for improving the article-- Conrad Devonshire Talk 04:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I have uploaded several new screenshots which can be viewed here. Feel free to use them as you wish.-- Conrad Devonshire Talk 07:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
The article seems to have come a long way and is nearing the criteria for featured status, but before proceeding with the nomination, there are a few things that need to be taken care of. First on my agenda is the article's locations section. As of now, the section is a stub, but I'm not certain if such a section is necessary. If it is, I will be happy to contribute to it, but if it's not, I would prefer not to spend my time and effort on it. The second main thing that I can think of that needs to be done is a general proofread of the article for the purpose of detecting uncited, poorly-worded, or unnecessary pieces of text. I would like to hear feedback this as well as any other ideas for improving the article-- Conrad Devonshire Talk 04:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I have uploaded several new screenshots which can be viewed here. Feel free to use them as you wish.-- Conrad Devonshire Talk 07:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)