From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Withdrew nomination. Article has even more problems and I don't have much time to fix them. — JA10 Talk • Contribs 21:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Pennsylvania Route 73 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
- Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
- Nominator's comments: Currently a good article nominee, PA 73 will also be a good candidate for A class.
- Nominated by: — JA10 Talk • Contribs 00:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC) reply
- Oppose for a few reasons.
- There's no formatting issues that stand out here, but some of the prose in the history can be refined and tightened. There are a considerable number of short, related sentences that can be combined or reworded to form a solid, complete sentence.
- The route also has some history dating back to the 1911 legislative routes that isn't addressed in the article. Check out the 1911 PA map.
- Some of the lengths lack non-breaking spaces ( MOS:NUM).
- After looking at the original route, the current route, and the text, it looks like the route's been rerouted in the vicinity of both Reading and Philadelphia. This should be addressed in the lead, but it doesn't need to be as nearly as detailed as the descriptions in the history. The rest of the lead should be lengthened as well, possibly including major roads intersected and major communities along the route - ones that help to give a brief overview of the progression of the road (and likewise of the article).
- That's all I see for now. -- TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Withdrew nomination. Article has even more problems and I don't have much time to fix them. — JA10 Talk • Contribs 21:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Pennsylvania Route 73 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
- Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
- Nominator's comments: Currently a good article nominee, PA 73 will also be a good candidate for A class.
- Nominated by: — JA10 Talk • Contribs 00:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC) reply
- Oppose for a few reasons.
- There's no formatting issues that stand out here, but some of the prose in the history can be refined and tightened. There are a considerable number of short, related sentences that can be combined or reworded to form a solid, complete sentence.
- The route also has some history dating back to the 1911 legislative routes that isn't addressed in the article. Check out the 1911 PA map.
- Some of the lengths lack non-breaking spaces ( MOS:NUM).
- After looking at the original route, the current route, and the text, it looks like the route's been rerouted in the vicinity of both Reading and Philadelphia. This should be addressed in the lead, but it doesn't need to be as nearly as detailed as the descriptions in the history. The rest of the lead should be lengthened as well, possibly including major roads intersected and major communities along the route - ones that help to give a brief overview of the progression of the road (and likewise of the article).
- That's all I see for now. -- TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.