![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
oversized cateory, the following upmerged templates that have passed 60 are eligible for the relevant categories
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Our largest stub category, Vologda Oblast has 26 districts and 4 towns of obast significance, for now I have just taken the districts. Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added VLG (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added the Oblast's name.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized Russian geography stub subcat. Propose the following split by district. Bashkortostan has 54 districts. Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added BA (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added the Republic's name.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized Russian geography stub subcat. Propose the following split by district. Vladimir has 16 districts. Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added BA (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added the Republic's name.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Yet another oversized Russian geography stub subcat. Propose the following split by district. Perm Krai has 33 districts (per the article, I count 34!). Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added PER (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added Perm Krai onto.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Yet another oversized Russian geography stub subcat. Propose the following split by district. Volgograd Oblast has 33 districts. Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added VGG (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added Volgograd Oblast.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
The smallest of the currently oversized Russian geography stub subcats. Propose the following split by district. Vorenezh Oblast has 32 districts. Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added VOR (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added Vorenezh Oblast.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Oveersized and we have the following categories possible from existing upmerged templates.
This will serious reduce the size to around 230 articles. -- Waacstats ( talk) 23:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Speedy proposal for the following categories as the upmerged templates that would feed these have reached 60.
Also if some one can let me know the best way to rename most of the templates in the hierarchy following the discussion earlier this month on splitting the French and German categories. -- Waacstats ( talk) 23:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Currently the third largest stub category,
Category:Parliament of England (pre-1707) MP stubs one that I am sure was around before my wiki break. There is already a split of MPs for Welsh constituencies but looking at the articles the vast number of them do not give the constituency that the person represented. If we split by dob then we would still have an oversize category just from those with no birth category. No organized parties as such back then for us to use either. Initially I propose splitting by century of parliament so we would have something along the lines of the following
Category names match the perm cats but the templates are a bit of a mess when it comes to 18th Century, does this say weill eneogh that it is for pre 1707 MPs and does not include MPs from the parliament of Great Britain who were English? Waacstats ( talk) 21:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another exceptionally large category,
Category:Pakistani politician stubs it looks like there are enough stubs for the following categories:
These national legislators do not seem to be split by state in terms of the perm cats so I think splitting these national politicians out first would be a good start. While some state parliaments could also do with categories
I have taken the categories from the perm cats and used the geo-stubs as a basis for the state name and the permcat use of Legislative Assembly/Provincial Assembly for MLA/MPA. I am hoping someone with a bit more knowledge of this part of the world can tidy-up if necessary any potential problems. Obviously templates first, categories if they get over 60 uses, which given the fact that the AzadKashmir category only has 5 articles may prove difficult for some. Waacstats ( talk) 21:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create by party.
Anyone cottoned onto the fact that I am running through the oversized politician categories. The permcat has no splits at all other than for the 43 speakers. A split by party would lead to at least 1000 Republicans just based on categories. so I see two options, first split by party and then date of birth:
or just go straight to date of birth split:
The result of the debate was create.
Yet another oversized politician stub cat, this time by party looks the best option so here goes:
These three are the only by party categories over 60 and all three appear to have enough stubs to warrant a category, but as always templates first. Waacstats ( talk) 21:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Although this category is slightly below oversized, I would not be surprised to see it oversized again soon. We already have a number of by party splits and a number of by state splits. I propose we complete the by state split hich should then kill the 'oversizeness' of this category, at least for a couple of years.
we do however also have two of the by party splits that are currently oversized, namely Category:Bharatiya Janata Party politician stubs and Category:Indian National Congress politician stubs. I suggest that we also split these by state and any split can then go to the state politician stubs category as well
If people can double and triple check these names for me I would be grateful, I have taken the names form the Geography stub category so hopefully there is nothing too majorly wrong. I did however drop the “India” from the Punjab INC/BJP category as I feel that there is no INC/BJP in Pakistan to cause confusion. Waacstats ( talk) 21:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create as UpperCanada-MPP-stub and ProvinceofCanada-MPP-stub; categories to follow if used on 60+ articles.
The Category:Ontario MPP stubs|Ontario MPP stub covers biographies of Members of the Provincial Parliament of the province of Ontario, Canada. That legislature was created in 1867. However, the stub is being used for biographies of members of the two predecessor legislatures: the Parliament of Upper Canada (which existed from 1791 to 1841), and the Parliament of the Province of Canada (which existed from 1841 to 1867).
I propose the creation of two new stubs:
Note that there already are categories for members of the Legislative Assembly of Upper Canada and the Legislative Council of Upper Canada, which would both be covered by the proposed Upper Canada stub: see Category:Parliaments of Upper Canada.
There are also categories for members of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada, and the Legislative Council. See: Category:Province of Canada people.
Skimming through the list of people with the "Ontario MPP" stub, there are several who were never members of the Legislature of Ontario, but rather the predecessor legislatures, and some of these were in fact dead before the Ontario legislature was created. Just in the "A" and "B" sections, for instance:
Individuals such as these should not be listed as Ontario MPP stubs; it's inaccurate and misleading
-- Mr Serjeant Buzfuz ( talk) 14:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized category is
Category:Italian actor stubs we already have upmerged templates and the following are all over 60 and therefore speedyble
Waacstats ( talk) 17:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I am sure
Category:Baronet stubs was on the oversized list before my wikibreak. I propose a split by the Baronetage. I am not 100% happy with the names here, as I don't know if people may use the England template for an English person who has received a UK Baronetage so any help on these would be gratefully recieved.
Waacstats ( talk) 17:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category contains 1361 articles,splitting by date of birth would leave approximately 700 articles. Splitting by diocese looks a non starter as none of the permcats have over 60. Another split of bishops that the parent perm cats use is by century so I propose we use this as most articles are also categorised this way and of the 100 or so articles that are not a quick look suggests most could be.
Waacstats ( talk) 17:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Anglican bishop stubs is oversized. Request speedy for
Category:African Anglican bishop stubs as {{
Africa-Anglican-bishop-stub}} has passed 60, should get the parent category below 800 i haven't yet sorted the following nations as I believe they can at least support a template by themselves and I would not be surprised if they also could support a category so I propose the following, categories only if the templates pass 60 uses.
Waacstats ( talk) 17:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category:British Christian clergy stubs is way oversized. I suggest an initial split by denomination, so
although not technically a split of the above, it appears to have been used on the British bishop stubs. Given a quick scan of the articles and a play on petscan it looks like the following are viable.
We also have bishop subcats of RC, Anglican and ChurchofEngland. Waacstats ( talk) 17:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Slowly working my way through
Category:Sculpture stubs with the new templates, and it looks like the following will be useful:
and, believe it or not,
Technically, these are probably speediable S2, but the earlier by-country templates were only agreed a few days back, so does this count? Grutness... wha? 10:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
existing upmerged template {{
France-politician-FN-stub}} has passed 60 stubs per the perm cat I propose
Category:National Rally (France) politician stubs and a rewording of the template itself to take into account the change in name of the party in 2018.
Waacstats (
talk) 13:27, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Split
Category:1990s country song stubs by year. Petscan results show that each year has enough for its own stub template and category
Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 06:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create upmerged templates.
{{
SouthKorea-diplomat-stub}}
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BostonMensa (
talk •
contribs) 23:58, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category with a possible speedy categories as upmerged templates already have sufficient articles:
Waacstats ( talk) 22:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized category, four templates are used on 60+ articles each leading to possible speedy categories
These will not reduce below 800 but itould be a start. Waacstats ( talk) 22:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, permission to finish creating the by decade stub templates and where these are used on over 60 articles creation of the relevant sub-categories as shown below.
As well as any older ones that prove useful Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Two oversized categories, unlike the British categogry no easy by subnation split, I suggest following the example used in the US category and by event so we would have the following templates and where these are used on over 60 articles the necessary category.
Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Both of these categories are oversized, per a couple of other sub-categories of
Category:Australian rules biography stubs I suggest splitting these by year of birth as follows with categories for those that are large enough:
Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
{{
Mexico-sportshooting-bio-stub}} has 68 uses on articles, I assume no one will mind these articles leaving the 700+ Mexico sportspeople stubs category.
Waacstats (
talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Looks like some one made a start splitting this by date of birth, some templates have already been created, I propose expanding this.
Categories where appropriate and potentially going back further depending on need. Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another one that was oversized until someone made a start o the split, I presume adding the missing positions should cause no problem;
I presume these categories will fill up as the goalkeeper already has 70+ articles and that was always used to be the last category to be created. Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create, and delete unused by-date types.
Looks like someone has already made a start of splitting this by date of birth, however the only other national categories I can see (US and Canada) that have been split have gone down the player and then by position route, for consistency would it not be better to do the same here with
and then delete the existing by date templates that are hardly used. Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There are currently some 1700 stubs in
Category:Sculpture stubs, and it would be good to split them. I can think of several ways of doing that:
a) by type of sculpture (fountain, memorial, bust, etc)
b) by century of creation
c) by location (outdoor/indoor, and/or by country)
I'd rather not have one split for indoor and one for outdoor, though... I'm leaning towards (b), but I could easily be swayed to (c)... so which would be the better option?
Thoughts? Grutness... wha? 16:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
UPDATE. The US template is very clearly going to be used on several hundred stubs, so I'll create
Category:American sculpture stubs
Category:United States sculpture stubs too (it's for sculptures in the US rather than sculptures by Americans, so the latter name is more appropriate).
Grutness...
wha? 10:35, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Hi all - I've been sorting through
Category:Church stubs, and quite a few of the items marked with church-stub (which should be for individual churches) are actually related to church architecture (styles and features of buildings). There are about 25 stubs (probably more can be found, too) that could happily be marked with {{
Church-architecture-stub}}, which would get around the problem (upmerged to both Church stubs and Architecture stubs).
Grutness...
wha? 11:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
oversized cateory, the following upmerged templates that have passed 60 are eligible for the relevant categories
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Our largest stub category, Vologda Oblast has 26 districts and 4 towns of obast significance, for now I have just taken the districts. Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added VLG (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added the Oblast's name.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized Russian geography stub subcat. Propose the following split by district. Bashkortostan has 54 districts. Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added BA (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added the Republic's name.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized Russian geography stub subcat. Propose the following split by district. Vladimir has 16 districts. Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added BA (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added the Republic's name.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Yet another oversized Russian geography stub subcat. Propose the following split by district. Perm Krai has 33 districts (per the article, I count 34!). Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added PER (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added Perm Krai onto.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Yet another oversized Russian geography stub subcat. Propose the following split by district. Volgograd Oblast has 33 districts. Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added VGG (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added Volgograd Oblast.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
The smallest of the currently oversized Russian geography stub subcats. Propose the following split by district. Vorenezh Oblast has 32 districts. Where districts share there name with a district in another oblast I have added VOR (the ISO-3166 code) and these are the only category names where I have added Vorenezh Oblast.
Waacstats ( talk) 23:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Oveersized and we have the following categories possible from existing upmerged templates.
This will serious reduce the size to around 230 articles. -- Waacstats ( talk) 23:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Speedy proposal for the following categories as the upmerged templates that would feed these have reached 60.
Also if some one can let me know the best way to rename most of the templates in the hierarchy following the discussion earlier this month on splitting the French and German categories. -- Waacstats ( talk) 23:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Currently the third largest stub category,
Category:Parliament of England (pre-1707) MP stubs one that I am sure was around before my wiki break. There is already a split of MPs for Welsh constituencies but looking at the articles the vast number of them do not give the constituency that the person represented. If we split by dob then we would still have an oversize category just from those with no birth category. No organized parties as such back then for us to use either. Initially I propose splitting by century of parliament so we would have something along the lines of the following
Category names match the perm cats but the templates are a bit of a mess when it comes to 18th Century, does this say weill eneogh that it is for pre 1707 MPs and does not include MPs from the parliament of Great Britain who were English? Waacstats ( talk) 21:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another exceptionally large category,
Category:Pakistani politician stubs it looks like there are enough stubs for the following categories:
These national legislators do not seem to be split by state in terms of the perm cats so I think splitting these national politicians out first would be a good start. While some state parliaments could also do with categories
I have taken the categories from the perm cats and used the geo-stubs as a basis for the state name and the permcat use of Legislative Assembly/Provincial Assembly for MLA/MPA. I am hoping someone with a bit more knowledge of this part of the world can tidy-up if necessary any potential problems. Obviously templates first, categories if they get over 60 uses, which given the fact that the AzadKashmir category only has 5 articles may prove difficult for some. Waacstats ( talk) 21:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create by party.
Anyone cottoned onto the fact that I am running through the oversized politician categories. The permcat has no splits at all other than for the 43 speakers. A split by party would lead to at least 1000 Republicans just based on categories. so I see two options, first split by party and then date of birth:
or just go straight to date of birth split:
The result of the debate was create.
Yet another oversized politician stub cat, this time by party looks the best option so here goes:
These three are the only by party categories over 60 and all three appear to have enough stubs to warrant a category, but as always templates first. Waacstats ( talk) 21:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Although this category is slightly below oversized, I would not be surprised to see it oversized again soon. We already have a number of by party splits and a number of by state splits. I propose we complete the by state split hich should then kill the 'oversizeness' of this category, at least for a couple of years.
we do however also have two of the by party splits that are currently oversized, namely Category:Bharatiya Janata Party politician stubs and Category:Indian National Congress politician stubs. I suggest that we also split these by state and any split can then go to the state politician stubs category as well
If people can double and triple check these names for me I would be grateful, I have taken the names form the Geography stub category so hopefully there is nothing too majorly wrong. I did however drop the “India” from the Punjab INC/BJP category as I feel that there is no INC/BJP in Pakistan to cause confusion. Waacstats ( talk) 21:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create as UpperCanada-MPP-stub and ProvinceofCanada-MPP-stub; categories to follow if used on 60+ articles.
The Category:Ontario MPP stubs|Ontario MPP stub covers biographies of Members of the Provincial Parliament of the province of Ontario, Canada. That legislature was created in 1867. However, the stub is being used for biographies of members of the two predecessor legislatures: the Parliament of Upper Canada (which existed from 1791 to 1841), and the Parliament of the Province of Canada (which existed from 1841 to 1867).
I propose the creation of two new stubs:
Note that there already are categories for members of the Legislative Assembly of Upper Canada and the Legislative Council of Upper Canada, which would both be covered by the proposed Upper Canada stub: see Category:Parliaments of Upper Canada.
There are also categories for members of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada, and the Legislative Council. See: Category:Province of Canada people.
Skimming through the list of people with the "Ontario MPP" stub, there are several who were never members of the Legislature of Ontario, but rather the predecessor legislatures, and some of these were in fact dead before the Ontario legislature was created. Just in the "A" and "B" sections, for instance:
Individuals such as these should not be listed as Ontario MPP stubs; it's inaccurate and misleading
-- Mr Serjeant Buzfuz ( talk) 14:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized category is
Category:Italian actor stubs we already have upmerged templates and the following are all over 60 and therefore speedyble
Waacstats ( talk) 17:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I am sure
Category:Baronet stubs was on the oversized list before my wikibreak. I propose a split by the Baronetage. I am not 100% happy with the names here, as I don't know if people may use the England template for an English person who has received a UK Baronetage so any help on these would be gratefully recieved.
Waacstats ( talk) 17:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category contains 1361 articles,splitting by date of birth would leave approximately 700 articles. Splitting by diocese looks a non starter as none of the permcats have over 60. Another split of bishops that the parent perm cats use is by century so I propose we use this as most articles are also categorised this way and of the 100 or so articles that are not a quick look suggests most could be.
Waacstats ( talk) 17:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Anglican bishop stubs is oversized. Request speedy for
Category:African Anglican bishop stubs as {{
Africa-Anglican-bishop-stub}} has passed 60, should get the parent category below 800 i haven't yet sorted the following nations as I believe they can at least support a template by themselves and I would not be surprised if they also could support a category so I propose the following, categories only if the templates pass 60 uses.
Waacstats ( talk) 17:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category:British Christian clergy stubs is way oversized. I suggest an initial split by denomination, so
although not technically a split of the above, it appears to have been used on the British bishop stubs. Given a quick scan of the articles and a play on petscan it looks like the following are viable.
We also have bishop subcats of RC, Anglican and ChurchofEngland. Waacstats ( talk) 17:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Slowly working my way through
Category:Sculpture stubs with the new templates, and it looks like the following will be useful:
and, believe it or not,
Technically, these are probably speediable S2, but the earlier by-country templates were only agreed a few days back, so does this count? Grutness... wha? 10:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
existing upmerged template {{
France-politician-FN-stub}} has passed 60 stubs per the perm cat I propose
Category:National Rally (France) politician stubs and a rewording of the template itself to take into account the change in name of the party in 2018.
Waacstats (
talk) 13:27, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Split
Category:1990s country song stubs by year. Petscan results show that each year has enough for its own stub template and category
Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 06:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create upmerged templates.
{{
SouthKorea-diplomat-stub}}
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BostonMensa (
talk •
contribs) 23:58, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category with a possible speedy categories as upmerged templates already have sufficient articles:
Waacstats ( talk) 22:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized category, four templates are used on 60+ articles each leading to possible speedy categories
These will not reduce below 800 but itould be a start. Waacstats ( talk) 22:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, permission to finish creating the by decade stub templates and where these are used on over 60 articles creation of the relevant sub-categories as shown below.
As well as any older ones that prove useful Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Two oversized categories, unlike the British categogry no easy by subnation split, I suggest following the example used in the US category and by event so we would have the following templates and where these are used on over 60 articles the necessary category.
Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Both of these categories are oversized, per a couple of other sub-categories of
Category:Australian rules biography stubs I suggest splitting these by year of birth as follows with categories for those that are large enough:
Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
{{
Mexico-sportshooting-bio-stub}} has 68 uses on articles, I assume no one will mind these articles leaving the 700+ Mexico sportspeople stubs category.
Waacstats (
talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Looks like some one made a start splitting this by date of birth, some templates have already been created, I propose expanding this.
Categories where appropriate and potentially going back further depending on need. Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Another one that was oversized until someone made a start o the split, I presume adding the missing positions should cause no problem;
I presume these categories will fill up as the goalkeeper already has 70+ articles and that was always used to be the last category to be created. Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create, and delete unused by-date types.
Looks like someone has already made a start of splitting this by date of birth, however the only other national categories I can see (US and Canada) that have been split have gone down the player and then by position route, for consistency would it not be better to do the same here with
and then delete the existing by date templates that are hardly used. Waacstats ( talk) 20:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There are currently some 1700 stubs in
Category:Sculpture stubs, and it would be good to split them. I can think of several ways of doing that:
a) by type of sculpture (fountain, memorial, bust, etc)
b) by century of creation
c) by location (outdoor/indoor, and/or by country)
I'd rather not have one split for indoor and one for outdoor, though... I'm leaning towards (b), but I could easily be swayed to (c)... so which would be the better option?
Thoughts? Grutness... wha? 16:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
UPDATE. The US template is very clearly going to be used on several hundred stubs, so I'll create
Category:American sculpture stubs
Category:United States sculpture stubs too (it's for sculptures in the US rather than sculptures by Americans, so the latter name is more appropriate).
Grutness...
wha? 10:35, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Hi all - I've been sorting through
Category:Church stubs, and quite a few of the items marked with church-stub (which should be for individual churches) are actually related to church architecture (styles and features of buildings). There are about 25 stubs (probably more can be found, too) that could happily be marked with {{
Church-architecture-stub}}, which would get around the problem (upmerged to both Church stubs and Architecture stubs).
Grutness...
wha? 11:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)