![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create.
Simeon ( talk) 12:09, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create; insufficient qualifying articles.
Rationale: Per discussion with administrator Bearcat, et al., elsewhere, we have a number of parliamentary groups/ technical groups (chiefly in the Senate of Canada) that are notionally both (a) non-partisan and (b) non-election-contesting. As such, they're not strictly a political party, though they are a parliamentary caucus (or a parliamentary party). Thus, I propose creating the Canadian parliamentary group stubs stub sorting category and re-sorting the applicable non-political party caucuses into this category. Note, too, that in the House of Commons, we could/would re-sort Democratic Representative Caucus and Quebec debout (short-lived spinoff from the Bloc) into this new stub sorting category. Note, too, this would be in keeping with our existing naming conventions such that similar stub sorting categories could be added as needed for other countries. Doug Mehus T· C 16:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus.
A search for the phrase "Vermont gubernatorial election" within the list of articles in
Category:Vermont election stubs reveals that the phrase occurs 67 times, meaning that there are 67 stub articles about Vermont gubernatorial elections. Because the common threshold of articles necessary to merit the creation of a stub category is 60, this suggests that creating a subcategory of
Category:Vermont election stubs specifically for stubs about Vermont gubernatorial elections could be in order.
Care to differ or discuss with me?
The Nth User
21:28, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Currently,
Category:Australian rules biography, 1900s birth stubs has over 1000 articles in it. I propose that it be split by year of birth (1900-1909).
Given the scope of the pages to edit (all 1000+), I also propose that DannyS712 bot implement the sub-categorization if this proposal passes. In comments, please specify if you support the stub templates but not the bot edits. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 07:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Currently,
Category:Russian football defender, 1990s births stubs has over 1000 articles in it. I propose that it be split by year of birth (1990-1999).
Given the scope of the pages to edit (all 1000+), I also propose that DannyS712 bot implement the sub-categorization if this proposal passes. In comments, please specify if you support the stub templates but not the bot edits. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 07:44, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create.
Simeon ( talk) 12:09, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create; insufficient qualifying articles.
Rationale: Per discussion with administrator Bearcat, et al., elsewhere, we have a number of parliamentary groups/ technical groups (chiefly in the Senate of Canada) that are notionally both (a) non-partisan and (b) non-election-contesting. As such, they're not strictly a political party, though they are a parliamentary caucus (or a parliamentary party). Thus, I propose creating the Canadian parliamentary group stubs stub sorting category and re-sorting the applicable non-political party caucuses into this category. Note, too, that in the House of Commons, we could/would re-sort Democratic Representative Caucus and Quebec debout (short-lived spinoff from the Bloc) into this new stub sorting category. Note, too, this would be in keeping with our existing naming conventions such that similar stub sorting categories could be added as needed for other countries. Doug Mehus T· C 16:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus.
A search for the phrase "Vermont gubernatorial election" within the list of articles in
Category:Vermont election stubs reveals that the phrase occurs 67 times, meaning that there are 67 stub articles about Vermont gubernatorial elections. Because the common threshold of articles necessary to merit the creation of a stub category is 60, this suggests that creating a subcategory of
Category:Vermont election stubs specifically for stubs about Vermont gubernatorial elections could be in order.
Care to differ or discuss with me?
The Nth User
21:28, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Currently,
Category:Australian rules biography, 1900s birth stubs has over 1000 articles in it. I propose that it be split by year of birth (1900-1909).
Given the scope of the pages to edit (all 1000+), I also propose that DannyS712 bot implement the sub-categorization if this proposal passes. In comments, please specify if you support the stub templates but not the bot edits. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 07:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Currently,
Category:Russian football defender, 1990s births stubs has over 1000 articles in it. I propose that it be split by year of birth (1990-1999).
Given the scope of the pages to edit (all 1000+), I also propose that DannyS712 bot implement the sub-categorization if this proposal passes. In comments, please specify if you support the stub templates but not the bot edits. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 07:44, 4 November 2019 (UTC)