![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
The result of the debate was do not create.
Yeah, I was like holy cow what did I just do then I tried to delete as soon as possible. But I also think people in the arts of fragrance don't fit perfectly in the fashion world. What about aromas and scents that exist outside of perfume and cologne. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RevengeOfTheRobots ( talk • contribs) 06:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create all except Australia-handball-stub for now.
Some speedy Australian templates and categories:
{{
Australia-gov-bio-stub}}
(s2) 144 results just for a depth 0 petscan on Au people stubs and Au public servants, and I suspect there are many more than this.Also, I was going to propose an upmerged {{
Australia-handball-bio-stub}}
for the intersection of {{
oceania-handball-bio-stub}}
and {{
Australia-sport-bio-stub}}
, but I have just realised that this applies to every single transclusion of the oceania template - I'm not sure what the best solution here is. --
Qetuth (
talk)
14:24, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There's a stub category for a subfamily of moths--Pyraustinae--with over 1300 articles listed. I recently went through the NON-stub category for the same subfamily, and separated out the genus Pyrausta as a subcategory. That new subcategory contains 295 articles, and I estimate that a subcategory for Pyrausta stubs will have about as many. With approval, I will undertake it. I've completed much larger projects here. And I recently did a new stub category and set up a stub template. So this one should go a little faster because I won't be figuring out from scratch what a stub template is and how to create one.
Uporządnicki (
talk)
13:53, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
There's a large stub category for Pyramidellidae, a family of gastropods. It includes a very large genus, Odostomia. More than 400 entries on the stub page belong to this genus. I propose to create a stub template for Odostomia, then set up and populate a stub category page for it. Yes, it could take me several weeks; I have done many projects of comparable size. I notice that not long ago, someone set up a non-stub subcategory for Odostomia under the non-stub category for Pyramidellidae. Someone then moved 11 of the 400+ articles, and that someone has now left Wikipedia. So I want to go ahead and populate the non-stub category. If I do both projects simultaneously, it should save me time in the long run.
Uporządnicki (
talk)
14:05, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
The result of the debate was do not create.
Yeah, I was like holy cow what did I just do then I tried to delete as soon as possible. But I also think people in the arts of fragrance don't fit perfectly in the fashion world. What about aromas and scents that exist outside of perfume and cologne. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RevengeOfTheRobots ( talk • contribs) 06:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create all except Australia-handball-stub for now.
Some speedy Australian templates and categories:
{{
Australia-gov-bio-stub}}
(s2) 144 results just for a depth 0 petscan on Au people stubs and Au public servants, and I suspect there are many more than this.Also, I was going to propose an upmerged {{
Australia-handball-bio-stub}}
for the intersection of {{
oceania-handball-bio-stub}}
and {{
Australia-sport-bio-stub}}
, but I have just realised that this applies to every single transclusion of the oceania template - I'm not sure what the best solution here is. --
Qetuth (
talk)
14:24, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There's a stub category for a subfamily of moths--Pyraustinae--with over 1300 articles listed. I recently went through the NON-stub category for the same subfamily, and separated out the genus Pyrausta as a subcategory. That new subcategory contains 295 articles, and I estimate that a subcategory for Pyrausta stubs will have about as many. With approval, I will undertake it. I've completed much larger projects here. And I recently did a new stub category and set up a stub template. So this one should go a little faster because I won't be figuring out from scratch what a stub template is and how to create one.
Uporządnicki (
talk)
13:53, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
There's a large stub category for Pyramidellidae, a family of gastropods. It includes a very large genus, Odostomia. More than 400 entries on the stub page belong to this genus. I propose to create a stub template for Odostomia, then set up and populate a stub category page for it. Yes, it could take me several weeks; I have done many projects of comparable size. I notice that not long ago, someone set up a non-stub subcategory for Odostomia under the non-stub category for Pyramidellidae. Someone then moved 11 of the 400+ articles, and that someone has now left Wikipedia. So I want to go ahead and populate the non-stub category. If I do both projects simultaneously, it should save me time in the long run.
Uporządnicki (
talk)
14:05, 9 May 2018 (UTC)