![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create.
Only one open proposal left by me, which means it's time to add another per my staggered approach described in said open proposal.
Significant precedent for the creation of genus-level categories exists.
This time, I'd like to propose the following:
Article-numbers given for existing categories do not include numbers in their extant subcategories. Unless otherwise stated, all articles for the proposed subcategories can be found in the lowest-level extant category I'm proposing it as subcategory of.
For existing category Category:Gelechioidea stubs (590 stubs, 11 extant subcategories), the following subcategory and template:
AddWittyNameHere ( talk) 20:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was created.
I recognize I still have an open proposal below—one that still has a bit over a day of waiting time to go—but I'm taking a "staggered" approach, if you will, to proposals. This'll allow me to on one hand not overwhelm the board with a single HUGE proposal, nor overwhelm it with large amounts of open requests (there'd be no more than two or at most three open sections by me at the same time), while still saving me time, allowing for a steady progress in handling Lepidoptera stubs.
The following proposal includes a genus-level stub category. As a similar proposal by another editor was subject of some questions recently, I figured I'd clarify in advance that there is significant precedent within the Lepidoptera stub categorization tree for splitting up along taxonomical lines, all the way down to genera if necessary. (Considering approximately one in every ~57 articles on the project is a moth or butterfly stub, it very often is).
As such, I would like to propose:
Article-numbers given for existing categories do not include numbers in their extant subcategories. Unless otherwise stated, all articles for the proposed subcategories can be found in the lowest-level extant category I'm proposing it as subcategory of.
For Category:Yponomeutoidea stubs (501 stubs, 2 extant subcategories), the following subcategories and templates:
AddWittyNameHere ( talk) 17:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I would like to propose the following templates, for-now upmerged to
Category:Moth stubs:
While I'm at it, I would also like to propose the following template and category:
Since no one has responded yet, may as well add the following in the same section:
Proposing creation of the following templates+subcategories to Category:Zygaenoidea stubs:
The result of the debate was create.
{{
Scythrididae-stub}} is still upmerged but is, per
the template transclusion count tool transcluded on 468 pages and thus well overdue a category creation.
AddWittyNameHere (
talk)
13:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create upmerged template.
I would like to propose {{ Iran-radio-station-stub}}, to be upmerged into the existing categories Asian radio station stubs and Iranian media stubs The first article to be tagged with {{ Iran-radio-station-stub}} would be Radio Farhang Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 23:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There are already existing stubs for each birth decade from 1890s until 1980s, and so adding the most recent decade makes sense. Moreover, there are about fifty articles to which this stub could be currently applied.
Deville (
Talk)
15:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create.
Only one open proposal left by me, which means it's time to add another per my staggered approach described in said open proposal.
Significant precedent for the creation of genus-level categories exists.
This time, I'd like to propose the following:
Article-numbers given for existing categories do not include numbers in their extant subcategories. Unless otherwise stated, all articles for the proposed subcategories can be found in the lowest-level extant category I'm proposing it as subcategory of.
For existing category Category:Gelechioidea stubs (590 stubs, 11 extant subcategories), the following subcategory and template:
AddWittyNameHere ( talk) 20:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was created.
I recognize I still have an open proposal below—one that still has a bit over a day of waiting time to go—but I'm taking a "staggered" approach, if you will, to proposals. This'll allow me to on one hand not overwhelm the board with a single HUGE proposal, nor overwhelm it with large amounts of open requests (there'd be no more than two or at most three open sections by me at the same time), while still saving me time, allowing for a steady progress in handling Lepidoptera stubs.
The following proposal includes a genus-level stub category. As a similar proposal by another editor was subject of some questions recently, I figured I'd clarify in advance that there is significant precedent within the Lepidoptera stub categorization tree for splitting up along taxonomical lines, all the way down to genera if necessary. (Considering approximately one in every ~57 articles on the project is a moth or butterfly stub, it very often is).
As such, I would like to propose:
Article-numbers given for existing categories do not include numbers in their extant subcategories. Unless otherwise stated, all articles for the proposed subcategories can be found in the lowest-level extant category I'm proposing it as subcategory of.
For Category:Yponomeutoidea stubs (501 stubs, 2 extant subcategories), the following subcategories and templates:
AddWittyNameHere ( talk) 17:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I would like to propose the following templates, for-now upmerged to
Category:Moth stubs:
While I'm at it, I would also like to propose the following template and category:
Since no one has responded yet, may as well add the following in the same section:
Proposing creation of the following templates+subcategories to Category:Zygaenoidea stubs:
The result of the debate was create.
{{
Scythrididae-stub}} is still upmerged but is, per
the template transclusion count tool transcluded on 468 pages and thus well overdue a category creation.
AddWittyNameHere (
talk)
13:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create upmerged template.
I would like to propose {{ Iran-radio-station-stub}}, to be upmerged into the existing categories Asian radio station stubs and Iranian media stubs The first article to be tagged with {{ Iran-radio-station-stub}} would be Radio Farhang Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 23:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There are already existing stubs for each birth decade from 1890s until 1980s, and so adding the most recent decade makes sense. Moreover, there are about fifty articles to which this stub could be currently applied.
Deville (
Talk)
15:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)