![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create.
While I'm working my way through the Paralympians I have noticed that the few wheelchair rugby players we have, are split between Rugby-bio-stub, Rugbyunion-bio-stub and rugbyleague-bio-stub I suggest a {{
Wheelchairrugby-bio-stub}} upmerged to
Category:Rugby biography stubs till it reaches 60 just to avoid confusion as to where the articles belong.
Waacstats (
talk)
16:23, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category is starting to get quite large, suggest splitting this by country, the following all have over 30 articles and I suspect at least some will pass 60 soon as I am adding more stub articles daily.
I am proposing we create the templates for now but if we get to the 60 mark in the next month or so then create the category. Waacstats ( talk) 00:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
I would like to see a category which holds all stub articles. Currently I'm using AWB to assemble a list of all stubs, which I will then run through, but it's very time consuming because many of the categories in Stub Types overlap. Articles can be tagged by more with more than one stub template. A category which held just articles would fix that, and it would also be useful because it could show how many stubs there are in en.wikipedia. It would be analagous to
Category:All orphaned articles. I have yet to find such a category, I don't think one exists, so I propose that one be made.
Jesse V. (
talk)
00:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
asbox}}
) will be in one to three stub categories, and every such stub category should be a direct member of
Category:Stub categories (and will be automatically if the category page bears a {{
Stub Category}}
). --
Redrose64 (
talk)
14:59, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There are currently over 900 stub-class articles in {{
WikiProject Toys}}. In sorting these articles into the proper stub categories, right now the only stub tag available is {{
Toy-stub}}. Therefore, I see the need for several new stub tags with corresponding sub-categories. I propose creating the following as children of
Category:Toy stubs:
There may be more, as I have only sorted through the B's so far alphabetically. But I already foresee the need for these stub categories, and it would be better to create them now, rather than have to re-sort Category:Toy stubs later, and update all the stub tags then. Fortdj33 ( talk) 18:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
Since articles marked with {{stub}} require sorting and it is unlikely that a case will occur where no stub category with an existing template is appropriate, the {{
stub}}
template and
Category:Stubs should be marked as historical.
G. C. Hood (
talk)
03:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
stub}}
could be given a notice - either on the template page, displayed in articles, or both - stating something along the lines aof the message at the top of
Category:Stubs. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
15:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. To pick up {{
MarrakeshTensiftElHaouz-geo-stub}} (83 P). Main article:
Marrakesh-Tensift-El Haouz.
Dawynn (
talk)
11:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose country level templates for all Asian countries with population > 20 million. The list here includes only countries which do not have templates yet:
Dawynn ( talk) 10:54, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. To pick up {{
SoussMassaDrâa-geo-stub}} (164 P).
Dawynn (
talk)
12:26, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose new template. Will triple-upmerge to:
Dawynn ( talk) 16:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Confession time. I've created several stub templates, mainly in order to facilitate the clearing-out of
Wikipedia:Database reports/Stubs included directly in stub categories but also to tidy up one or two other anomalies.
These are as follows: {{
1890s-comedy-film-stub}}
; {{
1900s-horror-film-stub}}
; {{
1910s-horror-film-stub}}
; {{
1920s-horror-film-stub}}
; {{
Ecuador-road-stub}}
; {{
NorthKorea-railstation-stub}}
; {{
Pakistan-railstation-stub}}
; {{
Portugal-gov-stub}}
; {{
Syria-gov-stub}}
; {{
Vietnam-railstation-stub}}
.
Not sure whether these qualify under "speedy creation", so I'm listing them all here. I've not created any new categories: all of these upmerge into existing stub cats (although {{
NorthKorea-railstation-stub}}
could really do with upmerging into non-existent
Category:North Korean building and structure stubs instead of
Category:Asian building and structure stubs). --
Redrose64 (
talk)
17:07, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
SriLanka-railstation-stub}}
. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
19:58, 19 July 2012 (UTC){{
Austria-railstation-stub}}
for which I also created
Category:Austria transport stubs. Unfortunately that came out at 49 articles, not the ~60 that I thought I counted in
Category:Austria stubs,
Category:European railway station stubs and
Category:Austrian building and structure stubs. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
21:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)The result of the debate was create.
Category:Asian law stubs contains 84 articles and two country-specific stub templates. Not all of the cat's members use those two templates - the following six are placed directly into the category:
Adat;
Attorney General of Sri Lanka;
Attorney General of the Maldives;
Attorney-General's Department (Sri Lanka);
Chief Justice of Malaysia;
Chief Justice of Singapore. Should we create five country-specific templates for these (Indonesia, Malaysia, Maldives, Singapore, Sri Lanka), or one generic stub template? --
Redrose64 (
talk)
16:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
This one slid into the oversized category this month. Propose exploratory templates by region.
Dawynn ( talk) 09:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There are 25 articles in
Category:Professional association stubs that would be better categorized with this stub, and I counted 46 in
Category:Scientific organization stubs before stopping at the end of M (it's a bit of work counting these, I'd rather just go through and add/replace the stub once it's made).
TimofKingsland (
talk)
07:37, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create.
While I'm working my way through the Paralympians I have noticed that the few wheelchair rugby players we have, are split between Rugby-bio-stub, Rugbyunion-bio-stub and rugbyleague-bio-stub I suggest a {{
Wheelchairrugby-bio-stub}} upmerged to
Category:Rugby biography stubs till it reaches 60 just to avoid confusion as to where the articles belong.
Waacstats (
talk)
16:23, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category is starting to get quite large, suggest splitting this by country, the following all have over 30 articles and I suspect at least some will pass 60 soon as I am adding more stub articles daily.
I am proposing we create the templates for now but if we get to the 60 mark in the next month or so then create the category. Waacstats ( talk) 00:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
I would like to see a category which holds all stub articles. Currently I'm using AWB to assemble a list of all stubs, which I will then run through, but it's very time consuming because many of the categories in Stub Types overlap. Articles can be tagged by more with more than one stub template. A category which held just articles would fix that, and it would also be useful because it could show how many stubs there are in en.wikipedia. It would be analagous to
Category:All orphaned articles. I have yet to find such a category, I don't think one exists, so I propose that one be made.
Jesse V. (
talk)
00:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
asbox}}
) will be in one to three stub categories, and every such stub category should be a direct member of
Category:Stub categories (and will be automatically if the category page bears a {{
Stub Category}}
). --
Redrose64 (
talk)
14:59, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There are currently over 900 stub-class articles in {{
WikiProject Toys}}. In sorting these articles into the proper stub categories, right now the only stub tag available is {{
Toy-stub}}. Therefore, I see the need for several new stub tags with corresponding sub-categories. I propose creating the following as children of
Category:Toy stubs:
There may be more, as I have only sorted through the B's so far alphabetically. But I already foresee the need for these stub categories, and it would be better to create them now, rather than have to re-sort Category:Toy stubs later, and update all the stub tags then. Fortdj33 ( talk) 18:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
Since articles marked with {{stub}} require sorting and it is unlikely that a case will occur where no stub category with an existing template is appropriate, the {{
stub}}
template and
Category:Stubs should be marked as historical.
G. C. Hood (
talk)
03:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
stub}}
could be given a notice - either on the template page, displayed in articles, or both - stating something along the lines aof the message at the top of
Category:Stubs. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
15:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. To pick up {{
MarrakeshTensiftElHaouz-geo-stub}} (83 P). Main article:
Marrakesh-Tensift-El Haouz.
Dawynn (
talk)
11:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose country level templates for all Asian countries with population > 20 million. The list here includes only countries which do not have templates yet:
Dawynn ( talk) 10:54, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. To pick up {{
SoussMassaDrâa-geo-stub}} (164 P).
Dawynn (
talk)
12:26, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose new template. Will triple-upmerge to:
Dawynn ( talk) 16:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Confession time. I've created several stub templates, mainly in order to facilitate the clearing-out of
Wikipedia:Database reports/Stubs included directly in stub categories but also to tidy up one or two other anomalies.
These are as follows: {{
1890s-comedy-film-stub}}
; {{
1900s-horror-film-stub}}
; {{
1910s-horror-film-stub}}
; {{
1920s-horror-film-stub}}
; {{
Ecuador-road-stub}}
; {{
NorthKorea-railstation-stub}}
; {{
Pakistan-railstation-stub}}
; {{
Portugal-gov-stub}}
; {{
Syria-gov-stub}}
; {{
Vietnam-railstation-stub}}
.
Not sure whether these qualify under "speedy creation", so I'm listing them all here. I've not created any new categories: all of these upmerge into existing stub cats (although {{
NorthKorea-railstation-stub}}
could really do with upmerging into non-existent
Category:North Korean building and structure stubs instead of
Category:Asian building and structure stubs). --
Redrose64 (
talk)
17:07, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
SriLanka-railstation-stub}}
. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
19:58, 19 July 2012 (UTC){{
Austria-railstation-stub}}
for which I also created
Category:Austria transport stubs. Unfortunately that came out at 49 articles, not the ~60 that I thought I counted in
Category:Austria stubs,
Category:European railway station stubs and
Category:Austrian building and structure stubs. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
21:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)The result of the debate was create.
Category:Asian law stubs contains 84 articles and two country-specific stub templates. Not all of the cat's members use those two templates - the following six are placed directly into the category:
Adat;
Attorney General of Sri Lanka;
Attorney General of the Maldives;
Attorney-General's Department (Sri Lanka);
Chief Justice of Malaysia;
Chief Justice of Singapore. Should we create five country-specific templates for these (Indonesia, Malaysia, Maldives, Singapore, Sri Lanka), or one generic stub template? --
Redrose64 (
talk)
16:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
This one slid into the oversized category this month. Propose exploratory templates by region.
Dawynn ( talk) 09:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There are 25 articles in
Category:Professional association stubs that would be better categorized with this stub, and I counted 46 in
Category:Scientific organization stubs before stopping at the end of M (it's a bit of work counting these, I'd rather just go through and add/replace the stub once it's made).
TimofKingsland (
talk)
07:37, 9 July 2012 (UTC)