![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create.
If I'm proposing painters, I should propose sculptors as well, I suppose.
Not sure there would be enough for a Category:South American sculptor stubs as yet, but that shouldn't be hard to make possible... -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 16:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Both feeding into the category
Category:African artist stubs for the moment. --
Ser Amantio di Nicolao
Che dicono a Signa?
Lo dicono a Signa. 16:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
As with composers - with a couple of rubs. I propose creating most of the following:
Six are already created, but they aren't used on many articles. Furthermore, Category:Brazilian painter stubs is underpopulated. Here's my thinking: if Category:Brazilian painter stubs is deleted for the moment, and depopulated, that combined with what is a.) currently stub-tagged and b.) what can potentially be stub-tagged (I know there will likely be enough) should be enough to populate Category:South American painter stubs. This should go some way towards codifying what exists.
Does this make sense? It kind of does in my head, but I'm not sure I'm translating it well. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 16:29, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I intend (and we all know what road is paved with those) to create a few more stubs on South American composers in the coming weeks. We already have a {{
SouthAm-composer-stub}}, but I think it would be easier to break down the tags by individual countries. Thus:
None of them have nearly enough articles for a separate category of their own as yet, so all would feed into Category:South American composer stubs.
Any objections? I'm about to suggest the same with painters. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 16:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
As below with Romania; there were a lot of untagged ones in the category, so this should now just squeak by. {{
Switzerland-composer-stub}} is the parent, of course. --
Ser Amantio di Nicolao
Che dicono a Signa?
Lo dicono a Signa. 21:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Just oversized we already have started to split this by department templates and regional categories. I propose we finish this with the following:
Categories iff we have 60 articels to go in them otherwise upmerge to the parent category. Waacstats ( talk) 16:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category it looks like the next level down in vurna is the district this would lead to the following
I don't think any except the last one need any disambigs, but if someone could double check. Waacstats ( talk) 12:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Some will need dabbing. I note too that named districts in Burma/Myanmar use a capital D, so all the categories will need to be changed appropriately. I propose the following (slightly renamed) variants on the above:
Grutness... wha? 22:42, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Pakisan Punjab is oversized but 2 upmerged templates have passed 60 and so the following two categories are viable
Any objections to speedy? Waacstats ( talk) 11:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I'm sure that this will aid in cutting down the oft oversized
Category:british actor stubs. Catscan suggests 75 articles plus.
Waacstats (
talk) 11:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Should now be viable with just over 60 tagged with {{
Romania-composer-stub}}. As usual, there were a lot in the general category that could take the stub tag but did not have it. --
Ser Amantio di Nicolao
Che dicono a Signa?
Lo dicono a Signa. 07:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was created.
Apologies for not doing this first.
Existing railway station stubs in Lincolnshire are allocated either to 'east midlands' or 'yorkshire & the humber', the current structure based on moribund english regions seems to have achieved little by way of reducing the number of stubs. Lincolnshire has an active project, and it makes sense to me to associate the articles more closely with the area people identify with than with discredited 1960s government pipedreams.
I have already found 41 members and have covered less than half of the historic routes. My plan was to build a list, then arm myself with some histories and work toward knocking them off.
I am also keen to have some sort of rational view of what is required for an article about a closed railway station. Thee amount of WP'ble info that exists for e.g. Braceborough_Spa_Halt_railway_station may well not exceed what is there already, and with the evidence of a stub list the Lincolnshire project would be free to decide that such articles may be complete enough.
Thus the stub list could be emptied in 2 or 3 years, which would be more useful than what is happening now.-- Robert EA Harvey ( talk) 06:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
{{
EastMidlands-railstation-stub}}
and
Category:East Midlands railway station stubs, with 332 members); to the north of the non-metropolitan county of Lincolnshire lie the unitary authorities
North Lincolnshire and
North East Lincolnshire, which between 1974 and 1996 were part of the County of
Humberside, and so they are in
Yorkshire and the Humber (for which we have {{
Yorkshire-Humber-railstation-stub}}
and
Category:Yorkshire and the Humber railway station stubs, with 474 members). See also
WP:UKCOUNTIES.{{
Lincolnshire-railstation-stub}}
(and
Category:Lincolnshire railway station stubs which presently has 41 members), the only existing subdivisions of any of these regions were: {{
GreaterManchester-railstation-stub}}
(
Category:Greater Manchester railway station stubs presently has 208 members); {{
Merseyside-railstation-stub}}
(
Category:Merseyside railway station stubs presently has 91 members); {{
Kent-railstation-stub}}
(
Category:Kent railway station stubs presently has 84 members).{{
Lincolnshire-struct-stub}}
. But even if this is done, the articles so tagged should still be reachable through the tree rooted at
Category:United Kingdom railway station stubs. --
Redrose64 (
talk) 15:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
This is a new taxonomic classification as of last year for the Heterobranchia. Proposing this as a parent-only category that will pull in
Category:Stylommatophora stubs,
Category:Systellommatophora stubs, and {[cl|Planorbidae stubs}} as well as most of the templates currently found under
Category:Heterobranchia stubs.
Dawynn (
talk) 14:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
oops! I didn't realize that we had to propose the creation of stubs beforehand. So it's already created but I think I should still put here.
Peaceworld111 ( talk) 21:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose building the following templates to upmerge to the spiders for now:
Dawynn ( talk) 13:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Time to breakdown yet another overlarge category. As I did with the
Category:Caenogastropoda stubs, so I would like to do here. I'd like to use parent-only subcategories for further sorting. All tagging will either be at the Heterobranchia level (for smaller families), or at the family level. I propose the following splits at this time:
Dawynn ( talk) 13:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating
Category:Cetacean stubs - we now have
45 articles tagged as {{
paleo-whale-stub}} and
19 as {{
whale-stub}}, giving a total of 64 articles for this category.
עוד מישהו
Od Mishehu 09:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Just a few more of these.
Will clear 51 more articles out of Category:Caenogastropoda stubs. Dawynn ( talk) 16:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
These will be pulled from
Category:Caenogastropoda stubs for upmerge to
Category:Hypsogastropoda stubs:
This will move a total of 91 articles into these family-level templates. Dawynn ( talk) 13:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
There is no Canadian Internet Company Stub, although there is a US Internet Company Stub, per:
I have seen some instances where Canadian technology companies in general, including Internet companies have been falsely tagged as US Company stubs. If there is a US Internet Company stub, then, presumably, there should be for other countries too where there is a significant technology sector. (How many technology related sectors does Wikipedia recognize?)
Enquire (
talk) 07:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized (for now) sorting will reduce it but as we already have Scottish and English I think the following will be of use
categories only if we have at least 60. Waacstats ( talk) 22:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose speedy creation of category. To pick up {{
Caribbean-artist-stub}}, as well as the following:
Dawynn ( talk) 19:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
The arachnids have grown too large. I'll propose a split of a couple groups for now:
The result of the debate was create.
I propose
Category:Egyptologist stubs, as a stub category for the permcat
Category:Egyptologists -
scan shows 98 stubs here. {{
Egyptologist-stub}} is a good template for it.
עוד מישהו
Od Mishehu 12:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose restoring the following from template redirects to full templates:
Propose new templates / categories for the following families:
Dawynn ( talk) 03:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following stub tags, all upmerged to the national people stub category and
Category:African scientist stubs:
These are all based on this scan, which would populate Category:African scientist stubs by a total of just over 100 articles. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Proposal for a template for
this clade under
Category:Gastropod stubs. I don't believe that there are enough articles for now to justify a category, but would like to separate these from the general gastropod template.
Dawynn (
talk) 13:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating this category, as a stub category for
Category:Social scientists. This category will be populated by already existing stub categories (e.g
Category:Anthropologist stubs), and possibly new categories or upmerged stub tags for permcats which don't yet have stub categories (any such new stub tags or categories willbe proposed first).
עוד מישהו
Od Mishehu 13:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
This is yet another split from the formerly oversized
Category:Gastropod stubs. This would pick up the following, as well as others currently tagged simply as gastropod stubs:
As part of this proposal the three templates listed above will be raised to full template status (as opposed to redirects to {{ Gastropod-stub}}. Dawynn ( talk) 13:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a further split of the Caenogastropoda, using the same major splits as the main category (
Category:Caenogastropoda):
Dawynn ( talk) 11:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Making a start here, will be back with a few more as the process goes on. 690 articles in
Category:European television stubs with some big countries not having their own stubs, and some upmerged templates above threshold.
Next I will look at television station stubs. Severo T C 18:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC) - updated 08:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC) & 14:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I know this doesn't need to be split, but found it while I was exploring outward from the gastropods.
Dawynn ( talk) 15:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
New template: {{
Cerithiopsidae-stub}}. To be carved out of the
Category:Gastropod stubs. Cat scan indicates 70 articles.
Dawynn (
talk) 12:31, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I propose to create {{
PuertoRico-road-stub}} and
Category:Puerto Rico road stubs which will feed into
Category:United States road stubs and
Category:Puerto Rico stubs. --
Admrboltz (
talk) 03:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Hopefully the final speedway category I bring here! Speediable
Category:Polish motorcycle speedway competition stubs and {{
Poland-motorcycle-speedway-competition-stub}} -
128.
Severo
T
C 18:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
OK -- this is one of the weirder things I've run into. There are a number of redirected stub template pages that I originally found under
Category:Gastropod stubs. The ones I've listed here, I have moved under the
Category:Caenogastropoda stubs, and am asking permission to raise these back up to a level of true templates:
Dawynn ( talk) 15:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I've just tagged a few things with {{
Finland-composer-stub}} - there should be 62 or 63 to support the new category. --
Ser Amantio di Nicolao
Che dicono a Signa?
Lo dicono a Signa. 17:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Support♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:07, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Template: {{
Patellogastropoda-stub}}. According to cat scan, would pick up
Category:Lottiidae stubs and
Category:Patellidae stubs, as well as at least 80 articles from the overlatge
Category:Gastropod stubs.
Dawynn (
talk) 16:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a speedy creation for this geography template for this relatively new district in
Karnataka. This will upmerge to
Category:Gulbarga district geography stubs for now.
Dawynn (
talk) 02:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
Category:Airsoft
About 13 stubs that don't have any real classification because they aren't firearms and using the "technology" stub is the only one that fits. If we could have an airsoft one it could help.
The result of the debate was create.
In the spirit of
Category:Heterobranchia stubs, I'd like to propose the following:
Building templates with these categories will allow us to move articles that may have families too small to even bother with templates at the family level. Ultimately, this should allow us to bring the Gastropods down to a reasonable level. Dawynn ( talk) 17:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
We now already have stub templates for each of the 21
Counties of Croatia, but 4 categories within
Category:Croatia geography stubs. Does anyone mind if I split them up? --
Joy [shallot] (
talk) 15:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Here's the statistic - now updated after sorting -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 15:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Most meet the speedy criteria already, there is potential for other immediate upgrades (237+91 are still left in generic categories), and it should all be done purely for the sake of consistency anyway. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 23:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I'd like to propose some new templates and categories for the Heterobranchia. In accordance with the Gastropod project, these are all at the family level.
Categories to be built, only if 60 articles can be found. Dawynn ( talk) 15:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Based on
this discusion, I'd like to propose the following Division level splits. Per the discussion, there will be no division templates:
I will point out that the indicated discussion is from 2007, and only one of the divisions have been created so far. Further, although a category exists for Mysore, none of its districts have been moved under it. Is this just a matter where the work hasn't been completed? Or has there been a change in thinking of how the Indian states should be split? Dawynn ( talk) 16:27, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Looks like the following are missing and worth speedying:
Dawynn ( talk) 19:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Looking to break two categories out of this. Templates already created and loaded, just need to decide on the category names.
Dawynn ( talk) 16:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
We have some for other birds already, so why not? (
75.189.148.4 (
talk) 16:50, 11 January 2011 (UTC))
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Oversized. Would love to propose many more, but I can't find any good ones. Open to suggestions.~ Gosox( 55)( 55) 22:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I've been a-sorting with {{
Ireland-poet-stub}}; this should pass the threshhold with a couple over 60. --
Ser Amantio di Nicolao
Che dicono a Signa?
Lo dicono a Signa. 21:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
725+ in cat and growing.
~ Gosox( 55)( 55) 13:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There may be only about 400 stubs in
Category:Wales stubs, but about a quarter of them seem to be organisations. a {{
Wales-org-stub}} and accompanyine
Category:Welsh organisation stubs would be fairly useful, methinks.
Grutness...
wha? 03:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was relisted.
There are a number of features that are in this county and are not in the San Joaquin Valley.
Sequoia National Park and parts of
Kings Canyon National Parks are certainly not in the valley. Currently 62 articles us the template {{
TulareCountyCA-geo-stub}}.
![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create.
If I'm proposing painters, I should propose sculptors as well, I suppose.
Not sure there would be enough for a Category:South American sculptor stubs as yet, but that shouldn't be hard to make possible... -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 16:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Both feeding into the category
Category:African artist stubs for the moment. --
Ser Amantio di Nicolao
Che dicono a Signa?
Lo dicono a Signa. 16:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
As with composers - with a couple of rubs. I propose creating most of the following:
Six are already created, but they aren't used on many articles. Furthermore, Category:Brazilian painter stubs is underpopulated. Here's my thinking: if Category:Brazilian painter stubs is deleted for the moment, and depopulated, that combined with what is a.) currently stub-tagged and b.) what can potentially be stub-tagged (I know there will likely be enough) should be enough to populate Category:South American painter stubs. This should go some way towards codifying what exists.
Does this make sense? It kind of does in my head, but I'm not sure I'm translating it well. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 16:29, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I intend (and we all know what road is paved with those) to create a few more stubs on South American composers in the coming weeks. We already have a {{
SouthAm-composer-stub}}, but I think it would be easier to break down the tags by individual countries. Thus:
None of them have nearly enough articles for a separate category of their own as yet, so all would feed into Category:South American composer stubs.
Any objections? I'm about to suggest the same with painters. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 16:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
As below with Romania; there were a lot of untagged ones in the category, so this should now just squeak by. {{
Switzerland-composer-stub}} is the parent, of course. --
Ser Amantio di Nicolao
Che dicono a Signa?
Lo dicono a Signa. 21:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Just oversized we already have started to split this by department templates and regional categories. I propose we finish this with the following:
Categories iff we have 60 articels to go in them otherwise upmerge to the parent category. Waacstats ( talk) 16:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category it looks like the next level down in vurna is the district this would lead to the following
I don't think any except the last one need any disambigs, but if someone could double check. Waacstats ( talk) 12:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Some will need dabbing. I note too that named districts in Burma/Myanmar use a capital D, so all the categories will need to be changed appropriately. I propose the following (slightly renamed) variants on the above:
Grutness... wha? 22:42, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Pakisan Punjab is oversized but 2 upmerged templates have passed 60 and so the following two categories are viable
Any objections to speedy? Waacstats ( talk) 11:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I'm sure that this will aid in cutting down the oft oversized
Category:british actor stubs. Catscan suggests 75 articles plus.
Waacstats (
talk) 11:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Should now be viable with just over 60 tagged with {{
Romania-composer-stub}}. As usual, there were a lot in the general category that could take the stub tag but did not have it. --
Ser Amantio di Nicolao
Che dicono a Signa?
Lo dicono a Signa. 07:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was created.
Apologies for not doing this first.
Existing railway station stubs in Lincolnshire are allocated either to 'east midlands' or 'yorkshire & the humber', the current structure based on moribund english regions seems to have achieved little by way of reducing the number of stubs. Lincolnshire has an active project, and it makes sense to me to associate the articles more closely with the area people identify with than with discredited 1960s government pipedreams.
I have already found 41 members and have covered less than half of the historic routes. My plan was to build a list, then arm myself with some histories and work toward knocking them off.
I am also keen to have some sort of rational view of what is required for an article about a closed railway station. Thee amount of WP'ble info that exists for e.g. Braceborough_Spa_Halt_railway_station may well not exceed what is there already, and with the evidence of a stub list the Lincolnshire project would be free to decide that such articles may be complete enough.
Thus the stub list could be emptied in 2 or 3 years, which would be more useful than what is happening now.-- Robert EA Harvey ( talk) 06:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
{{
EastMidlands-railstation-stub}}
and
Category:East Midlands railway station stubs, with 332 members); to the north of the non-metropolitan county of Lincolnshire lie the unitary authorities
North Lincolnshire and
North East Lincolnshire, which between 1974 and 1996 were part of the County of
Humberside, and so they are in
Yorkshire and the Humber (for which we have {{
Yorkshire-Humber-railstation-stub}}
and
Category:Yorkshire and the Humber railway station stubs, with 474 members). See also
WP:UKCOUNTIES.{{
Lincolnshire-railstation-stub}}
(and
Category:Lincolnshire railway station stubs which presently has 41 members), the only existing subdivisions of any of these regions were: {{
GreaterManchester-railstation-stub}}
(
Category:Greater Manchester railway station stubs presently has 208 members); {{
Merseyside-railstation-stub}}
(
Category:Merseyside railway station stubs presently has 91 members); {{
Kent-railstation-stub}}
(
Category:Kent railway station stubs presently has 84 members).{{
Lincolnshire-struct-stub}}
. But even if this is done, the articles so tagged should still be reachable through the tree rooted at
Category:United Kingdom railway station stubs. --
Redrose64 (
talk) 15:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
This is a new taxonomic classification as of last year for the Heterobranchia. Proposing this as a parent-only category that will pull in
Category:Stylommatophora stubs,
Category:Systellommatophora stubs, and {[cl|Planorbidae stubs}} as well as most of the templates currently found under
Category:Heterobranchia stubs.
Dawynn (
talk) 14:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
oops! I didn't realize that we had to propose the creation of stubs beforehand. So it's already created but I think I should still put here.
Peaceworld111 ( talk) 21:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose building the following templates to upmerge to the spiders for now:
Dawynn ( talk) 13:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Time to breakdown yet another overlarge category. As I did with the
Category:Caenogastropoda stubs, so I would like to do here. I'd like to use parent-only subcategories for further sorting. All tagging will either be at the Heterobranchia level (for smaller families), or at the family level. I propose the following splits at this time:
Dawynn ( talk) 13:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating
Category:Cetacean stubs - we now have
45 articles tagged as {{
paleo-whale-stub}} and
19 as {{
whale-stub}}, giving a total of 64 articles for this category.
עוד מישהו
Od Mishehu 09:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Just a few more of these.
Will clear 51 more articles out of Category:Caenogastropoda stubs. Dawynn ( talk) 16:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
These will be pulled from
Category:Caenogastropoda stubs for upmerge to
Category:Hypsogastropoda stubs:
This will move a total of 91 articles into these family-level templates. Dawynn ( talk) 13:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
There is no Canadian Internet Company Stub, although there is a US Internet Company Stub, per:
I have seen some instances where Canadian technology companies in general, including Internet companies have been falsely tagged as US Company stubs. If there is a US Internet Company stub, then, presumably, there should be for other countries too where there is a significant technology sector. (How many technology related sectors does Wikipedia recognize?)
Enquire (
talk) 07:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Oversized (for now) sorting will reduce it but as we already have Scottish and English I think the following will be of use
categories only if we have at least 60. Waacstats ( talk) 22:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose speedy creation of category. To pick up {{
Caribbean-artist-stub}}, as well as the following:
Dawynn ( talk) 19:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
The arachnids have grown too large. I'll propose a split of a couple groups for now:
The result of the debate was create.
I propose
Category:Egyptologist stubs, as a stub category for the permcat
Category:Egyptologists -
scan shows 98 stubs here. {{
Egyptologist-stub}} is a good template for it.
עוד מישהו
Od Mishehu 12:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose restoring the following from template redirects to full templates:
Propose new templates / categories for the following families:
Dawynn ( talk) 03:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following stub tags, all upmerged to the national people stub category and
Category:African scientist stubs:
These are all based on this scan, which would populate Category:African scientist stubs by a total of just over 100 articles. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Proposal for a template for
this clade under
Category:Gastropod stubs. I don't believe that there are enough articles for now to justify a category, but would like to separate these from the general gastropod template.
Dawynn (
talk) 13:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating this category, as a stub category for
Category:Social scientists. This category will be populated by already existing stub categories (e.g
Category:Anthropologist stubs), and possibly new categories or upmerged stub tags for permcats which don't yet have stub categories (any such new stub tags or categories willbe proposed first).
עוד מישהו
Od Mishehu 13:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
This is yet another split from the formerly oversized
Category:Gastropod stubs. This would pick up the following, as well as others currently tagged simply as gastropod stubs:
As part of this proposal the three templates listed above will be raised to full template status (as opposed to redirects to {{ Gastropod-stub}}. Dawynn ( talk) 13:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a further split of the Caenogastropoda, using the same major splits as the main category (
Category:Caenogastropoda):
Dawynn ( talk) 11:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Making a start here, will be back with a few more as the process goes on. 690 articles in
Category:European television stubs with some big countries not having their own stubs, and some upmerged templates above threshold.
Next I will look at television station stubs. Severo T C 18:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC) - updated 08:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC) & 14:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I know this doesn't need to be split, but found it while I was exploring outward from the gastropods.
Dawynn ( talk) 15:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
New template: {{
Cerithiopsidae-stub}}. To be carved out of the
Category:Gastropod stubs. Cat scan indicates 70 articles.
Dawynn (
talk) 12:31, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I propose to create {{
PuertoRico-road-stub}} and
Category:Puerto Rico road stubs which will feed into
Category:United States road stubs and
Category:Puerto Rico stubs. --
Admrboltz (
talk) 03:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Hopefully the final speedway category I bring here! Speediable
Category:Polish motorcycle speedway competition stubs and {{
Poland-motorcycle-speedway-competition-stub}} -
128.
Severo
T
C 18:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
OK -- this is one of the weirder things I've run into. There are a number of redirected stub template pages that I originally found under
Category:Gastropod stubs. The ones I've listed here, I have moved under the
Category:Caenogastropoda stubs, and am asking permission to raise these back up to a level of true templates:
Dawynn ( talk) 15:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I've just tagged a few things with {{
Finland-composer-stub}} - there should be 62 or 63 to support the new category. --
Ser Amantio di Nicolao
Che dicono a Signa?
Lo dicono a Signa. 17:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Support♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:07, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Template: {{
Patellogastropoda-stub}}. According to cat scan, would pick up
Category:Lottiidae stubs and
Category:Patellidae stubs, as well as at least 80 articles from the overlatge
Category:Gastropod stubs.
Dawynn (
talk) 16:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a speedy creation for this geography template for this relatively new district in
Karnataka. This will upmerge to
Category:Gulbarga district geography stubs for now.
Dawynn (
talk) 02:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
Category:Airsoft
About 13 stubs that don't have any real classification because they aren't firearms and using the "technology" stub is the only one that fits. If we could have an airsoft one it could help.
The result of the debate was create.
In the spirit of
Category:Heterobranchia stubs, I'd like to propose the following:
Building templates with these categories will allow us to move articles that may have families too small to even bother with templates at the family level. Ultimately, this should allow us to bring the Gastropods down to a reasonable level. Dawynn ( talk) 17:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
We now already have stub templates for each of the 21
Counties of Croatia, but 4 categories within
Category:Croatia geography stubs. Does anyone mind if I split them up? --
Joy [shallot] (
talk) 15:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Here's the statistic - now updated after sorting -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 15:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Most meet the speedy criteria already, there is potential for other immediate upgrades (237+91 are still left in generic categories), and it should all be done purely for the sake of consistency anyway. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 23:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I'd like to propose some new templates and categories for the Heterobranchia. In accordance with the Gastropod project, these are all at the family level.
Categories to be built, only if 60 articles can be found. Dawynn ( talk) 15:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Based on
this discusion, I'd like to propose the following Division level splits. Per the discussion, there will be no division templates:
I will point out that the indicated discussion is from 2007, and only one of the divisions have been created so far. Further, although a category exists for Mysore, none of its districts have been moved under it. Is this just a matter where the work hasn't been completed? Or has there been a change in thinking of how the Indian states should be split? Dawynn ( talk) 16:27, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Looks like the following are missing and worth speedying:
Dawynn ( talk) 19:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Looking to break two categories out of this. Templates already created and loaded, just need to decide on the category names.
Dawynn ( talk) 16:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
We have some for other birds already, so why not? (
75.189.148.4 (
talk) 16:50, 11 January 2011 (UTC))
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Oversized. Would love to propose many more, but I can't find any good ones. Open to suggestions.~ Gosox( 55)( 55) 22:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I've been a-sorting with {{
Ireland-poet-stub}}; this should pass the threshhold with a couple over 60. --
Ser Amantio di Nicolao
Che dicono a Signa?
Lo dicono a Signa. 21:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
725+ in cat and growing.
~ Gosox( 55)( 55) 13:41, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
There may be only about 400 stubs in
Category:Wales stubs, but about a quarter of them seem to be organisations. a {{
Wales-org-stub}} and accompanyine
Category:Welsh organisation stubs would be fairly useful, methinks.
Grutness...
wha? 03:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the debate was relisted.
There are a number of features that are in this county and are not in the San Joaquin Valley.
Sequoia National Park and parts of
Kings Canyon National Parks are certainly not in the valley. Currently 62 articles us the template {{
TulareCountyCA-geo-stub}}.