Mumbai articles |
Importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Top | High | Mid | Low | None | Total | % of Total | ||
Quality | ||||||||
FA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.17% | |
FL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.17% | |
A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
GA | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1.18% | |
B | 5 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 28 | 4.71% | |
C | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 2.02% | |
Start | 30 | 64 | 60 | 76 | 17 | 247 | 41.58% | |
Stub | 7 | 23 | 99 | 125 | 29 | 283 | 47.64% | |
List | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1.18% | |
Unassessed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0% | |
Total | 46 | 98 | 176 | 214 | 60 | 594 | 100% | |
% of Total | 7.74% | 16.5% | 29.63% | 36.03% | 10.1% | 100% |
Mumbai articles |
Importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Top | High | Mid | Low | None | Total | % of Total | ||
Quality | ||||||||
FA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.17% | |
FL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.17% | |
A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
GA | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1.18% | |
B | 5 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 28 | 4.71% | |
C | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 2.02% | |
Start | 30 | 64 | 60 | 76 | 17 | 247 | 41.58% | |
Stub | 7 | 23 | 99 | 125 | 29 | 283 | 47.64% | |
List | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1.18% | |
Unassessed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0% | |
Total | 46 | 98 | 176 | 214 | 60 | 594 | 100% | |
% of Total | 7.74% | 16.5% | 29.63% | 36.03% | 10.1% | 100% |