The following discussion is preserved as an
archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Closed as Demoted -
Cam(
Chat) 01:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Reviewers: Please say whether Milhist should Keep or Demote this article. Reviewers should satisfy themselves that the article fails on at least
one A-class criterion before recommending Demote and should explain their reasons when commenting.
Demote; the article has absolutely no referencing, and it was demoted from Good Article status. The prose is not very good, and the organization of the article is poor (a lot of it is composed of lists and such). JonCatalán(Talk) 19:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Perhaps major editors should be warned? JonCatalán(Talk) 19:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Demote - I initially thought this was actually up for promotion, and I was shocked; there are entire sections missing citations, and if it can't even keep a GA nomination, then it surely isn't A-Class.
Skinny87 (
talk) 19:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Demote - Massively lacking in citations and referencing. Prose is also a concern.
Abraham, B.S. (
talk) 22:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is preserved as an
archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Closed as Demoted -
Cam(
Chat) 01:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Reviewers: Please say whether Milhist should Keep or Demote this article. Reviewers should satisfy themselves that the article fails on at least
one A-class criterion before recommending Demote and should explain their reasons when commenting.
Demote; the article has absolutely no referencing, and it was demoted from Good Article status. The prose is not very good, and the organization of the article is poor (a lot of it is composed of lists and such). JonCatalán(Talk) 19:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Perhaps major editors should be warned? JonCatalán(Talk) 19:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Demote - I initially thought this was actually up for promotion, and I was shocked; there are entire sections missing citations, and if it can't even keep a GA nomination, then it surely isn't A-Class.
Skinny87 (
talk) 19:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Demote - Massively lacking in citations and referencing. Prose is also a concern.
Abraham, B.S. (
talk) 22:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an
archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.