Can the last four sections (Scandal, Foreign relations, Weapons and equipment, and Training) be expanded at all? There's a lot of good material before those sections, but these are fairly short and stubby. ···
日本穣? ·
Talk to Nihonjoe01:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)\reply
In the future, perhaps. The SBU's stuff is too secretive and a few details are told to the public by the JMSDF. I'll still try to do so. The scandal case is the one I want to expand, but JMSDF officers aren't allowing reporters to further details except what's reported. Now getting a picture will be harder as most of them will have to be under fair use, which is something the editors are against.
Ominae (
talk)
04:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)reply
I would have to say that while it could probably pass as a bad Start, it should probably be labeled a Stub. There are some sources, but things are just not arranged very well. I gleaned very little meaningful information about the story from that article. --
TorsodogTalk14:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Arashi - The article has been updated substantially by numerous contributors since its initial rating and please note it was written in NPOV with verifiable references. Kindly request a re-assessment under "B" Class Article criteria. Thank you.
Anonshoon (
talk)
00:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Greeeen - I am requesting an importance level assessment. An editor recently changed the importance from Low to Mid, and while I don't believe it quite meets mid-importance, I'd like another opinion. Sorafune+118:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Assessed as "C" and "Low"
Foujita - please give this an importance level assessment. Much work needs still to go into the article - bu tthe importance of Foujita as a leading memeber of the Schoolof Paris and Japan's most successful artist in the Western style should not go unrecognised. His influence on other artists such as Mogdiliani and Picasso is recognised (although not in the srticle) by notable sources. I would consider this to be an 'important' subject - and will try to put more time into it over the coming months
Kunchan (
talk)
15:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Assessed as C class and mid importance. The article needs more citations, especially in the latter half of the article. Many of the sections in the latter half are very small, too, and should be expanded to be more than one or two sentences (2-3 paragraphs of 2-3 sentences each is usually best to have a basic section fleshed out enough to be a separate section). ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe ·
Join WikiProject Japan!
08:08, 25 December 2010 (UTC)reply
2011
Fusakichi Omori - After learning about Doctor Omori and his rather amazing trip to the U.S. after the 1906 Earthquake, I found there was very little on the Japanese wiki, so I began his page and it was DYK on 17 May 2011. Please assess and rate. Thank you.
Ellin Beltz (
talk)
16:24, 19 May 2011 (UTC)reply
ClariS - Well it does have a good amount of sources, and it does appear to be well-written. I could assess it myself, but I would want some sort of approval first. Surely it isn't start class, it should at least be C-class.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew11:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)reply
C-class. Although the prose, grammar, references, etc are adequate, the text of the article is too short at present to fulfill Coverage.
Boneyard90 (
talk)
11:26, 9 January 2013 (UTC)reply
2013
Masanobu Fukuoka – I've just done some more work on it, after a break, and know much more source checking work and other work that needs to be done on it, so would seriously appreciate reviewer's (different and experienced people's) serious criticisms and evaluations of it. i have had serious difficulties with this article's bias, pieces of POV writing, poor sources pretended by editor as excellent sources, and insidious mis-sourcing devils–in–the–details, etc. Thanks in advance. ——--
macropneuma 23:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC) ——--
macropneuma23:53, 1 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Omoiyari Yosan - I just did a little work to bring it up to date and did a fair amount a couple years ago when it was on the cleanup list. I can think of some places where it could be improved, but it's definitely beyond Start-class at this point, IMHO.
Cckerberos (
talk)
07:43, 4 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Aya Hirano - I have sourced most of the remaining unsourced statements. Is it ready for C-class? Also, Hirano is one of the most popular voice actresses (at least during her peak) and was also very influential, so is she Mid-importance? My plan is to work on the article until it is ready for B class.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew00:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Funkist - This article is translated directly from Wikipedia Japan. So some user have put some notability but are not enought to qualify as good content article. I really want to make this article at least for B-class.
SNN95 (
talk)
00:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
This article is definitely still a Start-class. It has a summary in the form of a bullet-list, instead of full-text description, lacks sources, and supporting materials. -
Boneyard90 (
talk)
21:18, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Nichiren Buddhism Lately tried to clean up the article and added some more reference and interwiki link. Wonder if anyone could reassess the article / advise maybe even. Please notice the talk page – some heated debates were involved in that process.--
Catflap08 (
talk)
10:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Assessed C-class. Half the overview section is un-sourced, references are un-formatted, and the banner at the top of the article expresses concern that too many sources are primary sources or are biased. -
Boneyard90 (
talk)
21:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Abroad in Japan - I've improved this a lot recently, I'm aiming for it to be B Class. It also needs to be assessed for importance.Mccunicano 01:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Takamagahara - I added a lot of new paragraphs and relevant images. Also, I gathered great amount of academic articles as references; I tried my best to collect sources written in English but some of them are in Japanese. The stub had only a few sentences before my edit, so I would deeply appreciate it if someone could reassess the stub and see what class it is currently in. Thank you very much for your help and corrections!
Wiki3689 (
talk)
18:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Mizuage - I've tried my best to improve this article, and though it's only got five sources, I think I've lifted it above start-class now. I've included some relevant inline citations to back up certain important points (this being an article about a tetchy subject related to historical sex work), and one blockquote which I feel serves well to drive the point of the article home - also well-served by being a first-hand account of the article's subject and discussing the changes that have taken place in the karyukai since WW2 in relation to mizuage. I'm unfamiliar with article assessment and don't truly know what someone else would put this article down as, so I'd really appreciate some input. Thank you! --
Ineffablebookkeeper (
talk)
23:08, 20 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Wagakukodansho - Quite unfamiliar about how assessment work. I was just starting to work on the article and it got put into a
Draft:Wagakukodansho to incubate for lack of reference before I even had time to put any efforts in it (it was a single sentence at the time). Anyway, I did spend some time after that to make it as readable as possible, it's probably even more referenced than the Japanese wiki article now. I'd really like an external opinion/review about it as it is a first starting point for some further input on Education during Edo period. I am not sure if the format for Japanese is correctly used. Thanks for your help and corrections.
Tensaibuta (
talk)
13:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Haruma Miura - I redid the body paragraphs, brought all information up-to-date, added a discography, and sourced his entire filmography + awards. The current assessment is Start and I don't think it should be at that status anymore.
lullabying (
talk)
10:37, 20 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Nisio Isin - I've been working on the article for a few months already. It was assessed as a B-class article for the A&M Project recently. For the WikiProject Japan it's still in start-class.
Crosswrm (
talk)
14:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
From Space to Environment - I greatly expanded the existing sections, cleaned up grammar, and added several new sections to this article. Another editor also added a full list of artists from the exhibition. It is currently listed as a Stub, so I would appreciate a new assessment of the article based on these updates.--
Video Researcher Nina (
talk)
16:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Japanese verb conjugation I overhauled this article over the past month: copy-editing, citations, the works. It was rated as a "Start" class almost 14 years ago. I believe it should be rated as a B class article. Is it worthy of "good article" status too? —
JKVeganAbroad (
talk)
12:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
2020 Summer Olympics opening ceremony - As the opening ceremony happened a week ago, a wide number of editors and collaborators have poured their energy into this article. It is currently assessed as C, I believe with an editor it could be rated as B. Even suggestions on how to improve it would help.
Lama12 (
talk)
01:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Jurina Matsui - This article was assessed as Start in 2014. I overhauled and basically rewrote everything and fixed all citations so it meets Wikipedia's Manual of Style. I believe it deserves at least to be rated B, but feel free to leave some suggestions how to improve it.
Yolo4A4Lo (
talk)
09:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Kunisada Station First time trying to upgrade an article. Looking for assessment to understand a bit better where it stands --
Aziretan (
talk) 2:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Can the last four sections (Scandal, Foreign relations, Weapons and equipment, and Training) be expanded at all? There's a lot of good material before those sections, but these are fairly short and stubby. ···
日本穣? ·
Talk to Nihonjoe01:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)\reply
In the future, perhaps. The SBU's stuff is too secretive and a few details are told to the public by the JMSDF. I'll still try to do so. The scandal case is the one I want to expand, but JMSDF officers aren't allowing reporters to further details except what's reported. Now getting a picture will be harder as most of them will have to be under fair use, which is something the editors are against.
Ominae (
talk)
04:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)reply
I would have to say that while it could probably pass as a bad Start, it should probably be labeled a Stub. There are some sources, but things are just not arranged very well. I gleaned very little meaningful information about the story from that article. --
TorsodogTalk14:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Arashi - The article has been updated substantially by numerous contributors since its initial rating and please note it was written in NPOV with verifiable references. Kindly request a re-assessment under "B" Class Article criteria. Thank you.
Anonshoon (
talk)
00:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Greeeen - I am requesting an importance level assessment. An editor recently changed the importance from Low to Mid, and while I don't believe it quite meets mid-importance, I'd like another opinion. Sorafune+118:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Assessed as "C" and "Low"
Foujita - please give this an importance level assessment. Much work needs still to go into the article - bu tthe importance of Foujita as a leading memeber of the Schoolof Paris and Japan's most successful artist in the Western style should not go unrecognised. His influence on other artists such as Mogdiliani and Picasso is recognised (although not in the srticle) by notable sources. I would consider this to be an 'important' subject - and will try to put more time into it over the coming months
Kunchan (
talk)
15:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Assessed as C class and mid importance. The article needs more citations, especially in the latter half of the article. Many of the sections in the latter half are very small, too, and should be expanded to be more than one or two sentences (2-3 paragraphs of 2-3 sentences each is usually best to have a basic section fleshed out enough to be a separate section). ···
日本穣? ·
投稿 ·
Talk to Nihonjoe ·
Join WikiProject Japan!
08:08, 25 December 2010 (UTC)reply
2011
Fusakichi Omori - After learning about Doctor Omori and his rather amazing trip to the U.S. after the 1906 Earthquake, I found there was very little on the Japanese wiki, so I began his page and it was DYK on 17 May 2011. Please assess and rate. Thank you.
Ellin Beltz (
talk)
16:24, 19 May 2011 (UTC)reply
ClariS - Well it does have a good amount of sources, and it does appear to be well-written. I could assess it myself, but I would want some sort of approval first. Surely it isn't start class, it should at least be C-class.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew11:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)reply
C-class. Although the prose, grammar, references, etc are adequate, the text of the article is too short at present to fulfill Coverage.
Boneyard90 (
talk)
11:26, 9 January 2013 (UTC)reply
2013
Masanobu Fukuoka – I've just done some more work on it, after a break, and know much more source checking work and other work that needs to be done on it, so would seriously appreciate reviewer's (different and experienced people's) serious criticisms and evaluations of it. i have had serious difficulties with this article's bias, pieces of POV writing, poor sources pretended by editor as excellent sources, and insidious mis-sourcing devils–in–the–details, etc. Thanks in advance. ——--
macropneuma 23:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC) ——--
macropneuma23:53, 1 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Omoiyari Yosan - I just did a little work to bring it up to date and did a fair amount a couple years ago when it was on the cleanup list. I can think of some places where it could be improved, but it's definitely beyond Start-class at this point, IMHO.
Cckerberos (
talk)
07:43, 4 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Aya Hirano - I have sourced most of the remaining unsourced statements. Is it ready for C-class? Also, Hirano is one of the most popular voice actresses (at least during her peak) and was also very influential, so is she Mid-importance? My plan is to work on the article until it is ready for B class.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew00:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Funkist - This article is translated directly from Wikipedia Japan. So some user have put some notability but are not enought to qualify as good content article. I really want to make this article at least for B-class.
SNN95 (
talk)
00:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
This article is definitely still a Start-class. It has a summary in the form of a bullet-list, instead of full-text description, lacks sources, and supporting materials. -
Boneyard90 (
talk)
21:18, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Nichiren Buddhism Lately tried to clean up the article and added some more reference and interwiki link. Wonder if anyone could reassess the article / advise maybe even. Please notice the talk page – some heated debates were involved in that process.--
Catflap08 (
talk)
10:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Assessed C-class. Half the overview section is un-sourced, references are un-formatted, and the banner at the top of the article expresses concern that too many sources are primary sources or are biased. -
Boneyard90 (
talk)
21:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Abroad in Japan - I've improved this a lot recently, I'm aiming for it to be B Class. It also needs to be assessed for importance.Mccunicano 01:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Takamagahara - I added a lot of new paragraphs and relevant images. Also, I gathered great amount of academic articles as references; I tried my best to collect sources written in English but some of them are in Japanese. The stub had only a few sentences before my edit, so I would deeply appreciate it if someone could reassess the stub and see what class it is currently in. Thank you very much for your help and corrections!
Wiki3689 (
talk)
18:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Mizuage - I've tried my best to improve this article, and though it's only got five sources, I think I've lifted it above start-class now. I've included some relevant inline citations to back up certain important points (this being an article about a tetchy subject related to historical sex work), and one blockquote which I feel serves well to drive the point of the article home - also well-served by being a first-hand account of the article's subject and discussing the changes that have taken place in the karyukai since WW2 in relation to mizuage. I'm unfamiliar with article assessment and don't truly know what someone else would put this article down as, so I'd really appreciate some input. Thank you! --
Ineffablebookkeeper (
talk)
23:08, 20 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Wagakukodansho - Quite unfamiliar about how assessment work. I was just starting to work on the article and it got put into a
Draft:Wagakukodansho to incubate for lack of reference before I even had time to put any efforts in it (it was a single sentence at the time). Anyway, I did spend some time after that to make it as readable as possible, it's probably even more referenced than the Japanese wiki article now. I'd really like an external opinion/review about it as it is a first starting point for some further input on Education during Edo period. I am not sure if the format for Japanese is correctly used. Thanks for your help and corrections.
Tensaibuta (
talk)
13:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Haruma Miura - I redid the body paragraphs, brought all information up-to-date, added a discography, and sourced his entire filmography + awards. The current assessment is Start and I don't think it should be at that status anymore.
lullabying (
talk)
10:37, 20 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Nisio Isin - I've been working on the article for a few months already. It was assessed as a B-class article for the A&M Project recently. For the WikiProject Japan it's still in start-class.
Crosswrm (
talk)
14:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
From Space to Environment - I greatly expanded the existing sections, cleaned up grammar, and added several new sections to this article. Another editor also added a full list of artists from the exhibition. It is currently listed as a Stub, so I would appreciate a new assessment of the article based on these updates.--
Video Researcher Nina (
talk)
16:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Japanese verb conjugation I overhauled this article over the past month: copy-editing, citations, the works. It was rated as a "Start" class almost 14 years ago. I believe it should be rated as a B class article. Is it worthy of "good article" status too? —
JKVeganAbroad (
talk)
12:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)reply
2020 Summer Olympics opening ceremony - As the opening ceremony happened a week ago, a wide number of editors and collaborators have poured their energy into this article. It is currently assessed as C, I believe with an editor it could be rated as B. Even suggestions on how to improve it would help.
Lama12 (
talk)
01:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Jurina Matsui - This article was assessed as Start in 2014. I overhauled and basically rewrote everything and fixed all citations so it meets Wikipedia's Manual of Style. I believe it deserves at least to be rated B, but feel free to leave some suggestions how to improve it.
Yolo4A4Lo (
talk)
09:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Kunisada Station First time trying to upgrade an article. Looking for assessment to understand a bit better where it stands --
Aziretan (
talk) 2:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)