WikiProject Idaho |
---|
![]() |
Information |
Idaho Portal • Changes |
Types of articles that could/should be built
How to best find if an article already exists. Some have funny names.
How to request an article be built. How to build a new article.
Basic outlines (by topic)
Various templates to help with each section listed above
It exists, but doesn't say what you think it should say.
What constitutes good and poor references? + List of bad references
About copy-rights, etc.
Why we have them How they should "link"/"chain"
Someone has just created an article
How to get to Start?
Full topic, solid references, templates, and categories
Everything there is to know about the topic.
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes
This is an odd transient classification. It basically tells the group of "Peer-Reviewers" for Idaho to get together on promoting the article to either GA (Good Article) or FA (Featured Article) status.
Importance should be from the height of the State of Idaho. Meaning how important is it to the ENTIRE State.
Idaho would not exist without this article. (See Idaho). Generally, things that might fall in the 90-95% ranking.
Article topic would need to be recognized by 50% of the residents. "Most" people would know about this or be affected by it.
Basically, everything else. BUT MUST still be WP:NOTABLE.
WikiProject Idaho |
---|
![]() |
Information |
Idaho Portal • Changes |
Types of articles that could/should be built
How to best find if an article already exists. Some have funny names.
How to request an article be built. How to build a new article.
Basic outlines (by topic)
Various templates to help with each section listed above
It exists, but doesn't say what you think it should say.
What constitutes good and poor references? + List of bad references
About copy-rights, etc.
Why we have them How they should "link"/"chain"
Someone has just created an article
How to get to Start?
Full topic, solid references, templates, and categories
Everything there is to know about the topic.
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes
This is an odd transient classification. It basically tells the group of "Peer-Reviewers" for Idaho to get together on promoting the article to either GA (Good Article) or FA (Featured Article) status.
Importance should be from the height of the State of Idaho. Meaning how important is it to the ENTIRE State.
Idaho would not exist without this article. (See Idaho). Generally, things that might fall in the 90-95% ranking.
Article topic would need to be recognized by 50% of the residents. "Most" people would know about this or be affected by it.
Basically, everything else. BUT MUST still be WP:NOTABLE.