The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Toolbox |
---|
Ohio State Route 161 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
OK, will begin reviewing right away. – Fredddie ™ 23:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
First of all, welcome to ACR, CycloneIsaac! Normally, I go line-by-line and review thoroughly, but there are a number of things that need to be addressed before we can consider doing that.
With all this, I have to oppose this article attaining A-Class as-is. Please don't be discouraged. This is a stepping stone to improving your writing and researching skills. I am confident that all of the people who will comment after me would give you some tips. – Fredddie ™ 00:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
I will review this article. -- Rs chen 7754 02:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
I have to concur with the comments about the lead, and there is no map. The route description needs work as well. Again, as mentioned above, don't be discouraged, as GA in itself is an accomplishment; I would work on getting more practice with GA before working towards ACR. -- Rs chen 7754 08:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
As such, this article has several issues before it can seriously be considered for A-class. Therefore, I will have to oppose. I would suggest doing some more research, do some copyediting, and expand the article as suggested before renominating it here again. Dough 48 72 19:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Toolbox |
---|
Ohio State Route 161 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
OK, will begin reviewing right away. – Fredddie ™ 23:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
First of all, welcome to ACR, CycloneIsaac! Normally, I go line-by-line and review thoroughly, but there are a number of things that need to be addressed before we can consider doing that.
With all this, I have to oppose this article attaining A-Class as-is. Please don't be discouraged. This is a stepping stone to improving your writing and researching skills. I am confident that all of the people who will comment after me would give you some tips. – Fredddie ™ 00:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
I will review this article. -- Rs chen 7754 02:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
I have to concur with the comments about the lead, and there is no map. The route description needs work as well. Again, as mentioned above, don't be discouraged, as GA in itself is an accomplishment; I would work on getting more practice with GA before working towards ACR. -- Rs chen 7754 08:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
As such, this article has several issues before it can seriously be considered for A-class. Therefore, I will have to oppose. I would suggest doing some more research, do some copyediting, and expand the article as suggested before renominating it here again. Dough 48 72 19:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)