Toolbox |
---|
Kansas Turnpike ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
Review by Rschen7754 |
---|
This isn't a conventional ACR, so I'm going to note what I see offhand and the major obvious issues before doing a complete review.
|
Here is what should be fixed in order to prevent this article from going to FAR:
Since we have two reviews with some of the same issues above (and will probably end up with more), I am just going to list the changes I am making below so I don't have to post them to two different reviews. It would be appreciated if you would strike the relevant section of your review as issues are fixed, so we can see what's left to do. — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 10:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Rewrite coordination |
---|
Unfortunately, large portions of this article will need to be rewritten to comply with modern USRD and FAC standards. Interested editors should sign up below:
Other than the missing history cites, after that we can probably do a final sweep and call it good. -- Rs chen 7754 05:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC) reply
I can try to work on the RD. It'd be nice if someone could collaborate with me, though. – T C N7JM 10:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Ugh...okay, just so there's no confusion, we have this figured out. Rewrite coordination is as follows for the RD:
Route description rewrite is done. All sections are complete and sandboxes have been copied to the article. — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 10:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC) reply |
Hatting off-topic discussion. -- Rs chen 7754 07:47, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply |
---|
The I-70 exit number change needs to be addressed, because we were instructed to take exit 356, and the numbers jumped from 410 to 224 over a three mile path. So we turned back and back, until a police officer pulled us over, and he redirected us west along the turnpike. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brycecordry ( talk • contribs)
WP:WIAFA. –
Fredddie
™ 00:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
|
In short, here's what needs to be completed:
We're getting close. -- Rs chen 7754 08:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC) reply
If all these things are done, I will be declaring "Keep", but I will pull my "Send to FAR" declaration if something is done on the article, even as early as tonight. -- Rs chen 7754 01:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC) reply
I've gone through some of the references to tweak their formatting. I am going to see about replacing the MSR Maps citations in their entirety in the near future. Microsoft was supposed to shut down that website a year, and the USGS has created their own archive of topographic quadrangle maps. I used that archive to pull a historic quadrangle of the Gwinn, Michigan, area for the M-553 article, and I think it would be better to cite USGS topos direct from the source. That way we get full bibliographic details (scale, series, etc) to add to the footnotes. Imzadi 1979 → 17:55, 30 June 2013 (UTC) reply
I have updated almost all of the NBI references. There are three problems yet to be resolved:
With permission from Scott5114 I'm hatting the unnecessary commentary, unnecessary on both our parts. -- Rs chen 7754 01:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC) reply |
---|
|
Toolbox |
---|
Kansas Turnpike ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
Review by Rschen7754 |
---|
This isn't a conventional ACR, so I'm going to note what I see offhand and the major obvious issues before doing a complete review.
|
Here is what should be fixed in order to prevent this article from going to FAR:
Since we have two reviews with some of the same issues above (and will probably end up with more), I am just going to list the changes I am making below so I don't have to post them to two different reviews. It would be appreciated if you would strike the relevant section of your review as issues are fixed, so we can see what's left to do. — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 10:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Rewrite coordination |
---|
Unfortunately, large portions of this article will need to be rewritten to comply with modern USRD and FAC standards. Interested editors should sign up below:
Other than the missing history cites, after that we can probably do a final sweep and call it good. -- Rs chen 7754 05:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC) reply
I can try to work on the RD. It'd be nice if someone could collaborate with me, though. – T C N7JM 10:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Ugh...okay, just so there's no confusion, we have this figured out. Rewrite coordination is as follows for the RD:
Route description rewrite is done. All sections are complete and sandboxes have been copied to the article. — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 10:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC) reply |
Hatting off-topic discussion. -- Rs chen 7754 07:47, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply |
---|
The I-70 exit number change needs to be addressed, because we were instructed to take exit 356, and the numbers jumped from 410 to 224 over a three mile path. So we turned back and back, until a police officer pulled us over, and he redirected us west along the turnpike. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brycecordry ( talk • contribs)
WP:WIAFA. –
Fredddie
™ 00:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
|
In short, here's what needs to be completed:
We're getting close. -- Rs chen 7754 08:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC) reply
If all these things are done, I will be declaring "Keep", but I will pull my "Send to FAR" declaration if something is done on the article, even as early as tonight. -- Rs chen 7754 01:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC) reply
I've gone through some of the references to tweak their formatting. I am going to see about replacing the MSR Maps citations in their entirety in the near future. Microsoft was supposed to shut down that website a year, and the USGS has created their own archive of topographic quadrangle maps. I used that archive to pull a historic quadrangle of the Gwinn, Michigan, area for the M-553 article, and I think it would be better to cite USGS topos direct from the source. That way we get full bibliographic details (scale, series, etc) to add to the footnotes. Imzadi 1979 → 17:55, 30 June 2013 (UTC) reply
I have updated almost all of the NBI references. There are three problems yet to be resolved:
With permission from Scott5114 I'm hatting the unnecessary commentary, unnecessary on both our parts. -- Rs chen 7754 01:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC) reply |
---|
|