![]() | This recruitment has ended and is now archived. Please do not edit the contents of this page. |
Status: CLOSED DUE TO LACK OF INTEREST
Date Started: 2013-06-21
Date Ended: 2013-09-26
Recruiter: Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk)
Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Good article criteria and Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 22:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome. I've already posted the quiz I'd like to you to take, as suggested by the Centre. Now I'll answer your questions.
Hope I answered your questions adequately. If you have more questions, let me know; that's what I'm here for. Good luck! Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 17:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Take the quiz below. You must score at least an 80% (5 out of 7) to pass.
1. What must an article comply with to be considered a GA?
2. What is required for neutrality in a GA?
3. What does the GA criteria mean about a GA being "broad in its coverage"?
4. What is meant by stability in the GA criteria?
5. Images in GAs require the following:
6. True or false: Stand-alone lists can be classified as GAs.
7. When does an article lose its status as a GA?
Technically, you got 6 out of 7; I was going for, in question 1, that an article must comply with the manual of style. I can see how unclear that question could be, so I'd eliminate that question if it made any difference. Nice job. We'll move to the next step now. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 20:02, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, wanted to check in, since it's been several days since I posted the quiz. Also, I wanted to make sure that you followed up on the GA review you started back in early June, Talk:University of California, San Diego/GA3. As was stated on your talk page, please address it or end the review and put it back in the queue. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 15:23, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
D, you're my second recuittee, so I thought that, instead of repeating myself here, that I'd refer to what I've already done. Please read this: [1] If you like, I can model another GA review for you. It's up to you. I could review the above-mentioned GA, instead of putting it back in the queue. The trouble with that is that the article's long and complicated. Let me know. Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 20:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This recruitment has ended and is now archived. Please do not edit the contents of this page. |
Status: CLOSED DUE TO LACK OF INTEREST
Date Started: 2013-06-21
Date Ended: 2013-09-26
Recruiter: Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk)
Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Good article criteria and Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 22:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome. I've already posted the quiz I'd like to you to take, as suggested by the Centre. Now I'll answer your questions.
Hope I answered your questions adequately. If you have more questions, let me know; that's what I'm here for. Good luck! Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 17:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Take the quiz below. You must score at least an 80% (5 out of 7) to pass.
1. What must an article comply with to be considered a GA?
2. What is required for neutrality in a GA?
3. What does the GA criteria mean about a GA being "broad in its coverage"?
4. What is meant by stability in the GA criteria?
5. Images in GAs require the following:
6. True or false: Stand-alone lists can be classified as GAs.
7. When does an article lose its status as a GA?
Technically, you got 6 out of 7; I was going for, in question 1, that an article must comply with the manual of style. I can see how unclear that question could be, so I'd eliminate that question if it made any difference. Nice job. We'll move to the next step now. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 20:02, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, wanted to check in, since it's been several days since I posted the quiz. Also, I wanted to make sure that you followed up on the GA review you started back in early June, Talk:University of California, San Diego/GA3. As was stated on your talk page, please address it or end the review and put it back in the queue. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 15:23, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
D, you're my second recuittee, so I thought that, instead of repeating myself here, that I'd refer to what I've already done. Please read this: [1] If you like, I can model another GA review for you. It's up to you. I could review the above-mentioned GA, instead of putting it back in the queue. The trouble with that is that the article's long and complicated. Let me know. Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 20:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)