![]() ![]() | |
Fisheries and Fishing | |
Main project | talk |
Assessment statistics | |
Traffic statistics | |
Articles | talk |
Proposals | talk |
Resources | talk |
Project subpages | |
Members | |
Requested fishing articles | talk |
Things you can do | |
To-do list | |
Assessment | |
Unassessed articles | |
Expand stub class articles | |
Other | |
Outreach | |
Newsletter | |
Recent updates | |
Featured/good articles | |
Categories | |
Templates | |
Articles for deletion | talk |
Subpages |
Please add or comment on proposals below. (Sign your contributions with four tildes: ~~~~)
Proposal: Change Category:Fishing industry to Category:Commercial fishing
Done
themcman1
talk
12:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Proposal: Add Category:Recreational fishing techniques and Category:Comercial fishing techniques
Whether articles should exist on fishing for a given species, e.g. Fishing for pike
Perhaps an infobox detailing the yearly tonnage of fish caught, quotas (if enforced), to give an at a glance summary of the commercial fishing of a species? I have thrown together a crude mock-up here to illustrate what I mean. Bass fishing physicist 18:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
(Please feel free to add more Fishing related/associated articles to be included under this project --> IMPORTANT: Only related articles should be included)
On giving someone a Barnstar the other day, I found that there are various awards for certain WikiProjects. I know we're kind of young, but is there any interest in having a Fishing Project award? LaughingVulcan Laugh With Me / Logical Entries 02:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that the unassessed article count just jumped up to 170... Looks like Themcman1 got assistance of a bot to help us find aritcles (kewl!) My question is if anybody else wants to pool up to systematically rate all the new articles. I've been adding my own assessments here and there, but I'm wondering if teaming up would help produce a better consensus and more accurate ratings. LaughingVulcan 18:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
The current nature of Fly Fishing is so extensive and complex that a single article cannot do it justice. This is evident by much of the very specialized content the article contains now, while there is a complete lack of coverage on many other relevant fly fishing topics.
Wikipedia Summary Style: WP:SS provides a useful way to deal with these broad and complex subjects. In a way the process has already started with the section on the Artificial fly and I am personnally working in a History of Fly fishing article. If others agree and can jump in, much of the current content on Fly fishing for trout and well as equipment can be spiit out into separate articles and summarized in this article. With the addition of Geronimo20's navigation templates, turning the fly fishing article into a Summary article seems like the right thing to do. It doesn't have to be accomplished overnight, but if there is concensus, we can proceed to pursue transition to a Summary style article.-- Mike Cline ( talk) 14:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
I put this proposal on the fly fishing talk page last month, but it got no notice or traction. Maybe it will here!-- Mike Cline ( talk) 13:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
I have a lot of historical information which I think I ought to be sharing via Wikipedia. The current format needs significant expansion and elaboration, in my view, for these purposes. Venator48 ( talk) 18:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
Fisheries and Fishing | |
Main project | talk |
Assessment statistics | |
Traffic statistics | |
Articles | talk |
Proposals | talk |
Resources | talk |
Project subpages | |
Members | |
Requested fishing articles | talk |
Things you can do | |
To-do list | |
Assessment | |
Unassessed articles | |
Expand stub class articles | |
Other | |
Outreach | |
Newsletter | |
Recent updates | |
Featured/good articles | |
Categories | |
Templates | |
Articles for deletion | talk |
Subpages |
Please add or comment on proposals below. (Sign your contributions with four tildes: ~~~~)
Proposal: Change Category:Fishing industry to Category:Commercial fishing
Done
themcman1
talk
12:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Proposal: Add Category:Recreational fishing techniques and Category:Comercial fishing techniques
Whether articles should exist on fishing for a given species, e.g. Fishing for pike
Perhaps an infobox detailing the yearly tonnage of fish caught, quotas (if enforced), to give an at a glance summary of the commercial fishing of a species? I have thrown together a crude mock-up here to illustrate what I mean. Bass fishing physicist 18:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
(Please feel free to add more Fishing related/associated articles to be included under this project --> IMPORTANT: Only related articles should be included)
On giving someone a Barnstar the other day, I found that there are various awards for certain WikiProjects. I know we're kind of young, but is there any interest in having a Fishing Project award? LaughingVulcan Laugh With Me / Logical Entries 02:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that the unassessed article count just jumped up to 170... Looks like Themcman1 got assistance of a bot to help us find aritcles (kewl!) My question is if anybody else wants to pool up to systematically rate all the new articles. I've been adding my own assessments here and there, but I'm wondering if teaming up would help produce a better consensus and more accurate ratings. LaughingVulcan 18:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
The current nature of Fly Fishing is so extensive and complex that a single article cannot do it justice. This is evident by much of the very specialized content the article contains now, while there is a complete lack of coverage on many other relevant fly fishing topics.
Wikipedia Summary Style: WP:SS provides a useful way to deal with these broad and complex subjects. In a way the process has already started with the section on the Artificial fly and I am personnally working in a History of Fly fishing article. If others agree and can jump in, much of the current content on Fly fishing for trout and well as equipment can be spiit out into separate articles and summarized in this article. With the addition of Geronimo20's navigation templates, turning the fly fishing article into a Summary article seems like the right thing to do. It doesn't have to be accomplished overnight, but if there is concensus, we can proceed to pursue transition to a Summary style article.-- Mike Cline ( talk) 14:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
I put this proposal on the fly fishing talk page last month, but it got no notice or traction. Maybe it will here!-- Mike Cline ( talk) 13:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
I have a lot of historical information which I think I ought to be sharing via Wikipedia. The current format needs significant expansion and elaboration, in my view, for these purposes. Venator48 ( talk) 18:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)