Warrant (finance): somewhat confusing and overly focused on certain types of warrants. A challenging article to improve as warrants work differently in different markets – will probably require expertise or a lot of research. —
Mx. Granger (
talk·contribs) 17:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
VIX: poorly sourced, confusingly written, and needs more information. This is an important topic and deserves a better article. —
Mx. Granger (
talk·contribs) 17:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
CMT Association: Someone recently proposed its deletion which was denied because it's still a notable organization, especially for folks in technical analysis. However, the way it's written needs clean up by 1. Delete uncited material 2. Adding citations 3. Revise non-neutral/advertising language. I would encourage anyone familiar with the designation to help out. Thank you. -
Kazuha1029 (
talk) 02:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Financial analyst: Please revisit its rating; it's undergone a substantial rework in the last year. Thanks.
Fintor (
talk) 10:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Immunization (Finance): there's a lot of good explanation here, but it contains only one citation. Needs additional citations to improve verifiability. Cordially,
BuzzWeiser196 (
talk) 10:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Environmental finance Requesting assessment. The article has started as a stub but I have contributed signifacntly and believe it is at least a C class article. Thanks!
Biographies of Federal agencies are easy to do, because the agency websites have biographies, and other websites have more information about nominees/commissioners. I have done several myself, but right now I am working in other areas, especially
Municipal authority (Pennsylvania) connected agencies, such as those shown in
List of municipal authorities in Philadelphia. Please consider doing some biographies of these commissioners.
Fintor do you still want someone to take a look at this article? Also, is this an assessment request or a content peer review request?
A. C. Santacruz ⁂
Please ping me! 12:33, 27 March 2022 (UTC)reply
I'd like to see the history of the carried interest 'loophole'. When was it passed, at least?
Craig234
That seems to be one not really trivial aspect of the
HIRE Act[1]
(
... or better not really sure to get the right infos as non-expert in this subject and to make matters worse in awareness of my alien English)
It would be nice, if a native speaker & expert could clarify this knowledge gap! (
Jaybear (
talk) 16:42, 21 December 2012 (UTC))reply
Financial economics - just "completed" a major re-write. Please review the article, as well revisit its quality-rating.
Fintor (
talk) 07:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC). Please review changes of last few days.
Fintor (
talk) 12:59, 6 January 2016 (UTC)reply
There are a number of missing articles related to actuarial science. For example, standard property and casualty reserving techniques such as chain-ladder have no articles and are, in my opinion, notable. -
KaJunl (
talk) 01:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
We need coverage of
continuation funds, an investment vehicle of private equite companies in which they sell the vehicle to themselves for profit. One source is
FT article. —
Ixtal(
T /
C ) ⁂ Join
WP:FINANCE! 16:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Requests backlog
Meat and Livestock Australia Hi, I have expanded this article over the past few months and the article has reached a C-class article status. Assessment against the b-class article criteria would be highly appreciated. Thank you!
Umbrella.Won (
talk) 01:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Net capital rule - This article really needs someone with regulatory knowledge and the expertise to interpret the online news articles covering the post-2004 changes to this topic. I've done some work on the intro (watch for subtle bias throughout), but the rest of the article (and the ghastly footnote section) reads like a lawyer trying to make sense out of a bunch of primary documents.—
DMCer™ 14:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Debt-to-capital ratio - This is a short job, but it's been requesting attention from an expert in the economics portal for ~2 years. It just needs a bit of cleanup (there's
talk of including it in
Template:Stock market once this happens). Thanks.—
DMCer™ 14:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Put option - I believe the formula listed for calculating the premium paid to the seller of a put contract is flawed completely undermining article.
SamISmyth (
talk) 06:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Payday loan and
Predatory lending - The payday loan article has suffered from back and forth editing from both sides of this issue and could use the expertise of financial editors who can cut through the lobbying/pr/advocate/other noise stuff to get to the encyclopedic tone and sources. I can usually help with sourcing, but please see the article history and
Talk:Payday loan.
Flowanda |
Talk 02:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Yield spread,
Yield curve spread,
TED spread,
Mortgage yield, etc. - Foundational concepts about yields and spreads should be explained clearly. But we also need to rethink how these very similar pages are related to one another. Some of them are confusingly similar.
Finnancier (
talk) 15:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Sovys / Sovereign yield spread futures. I've created a redirect to CME but I think an article could make sense... however they're so shite that it's hardly important! EggCentric 08:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Regulation S-K: I just copyedited this, and there are a number of areas needing attention - most especially making sure I didn't introduce any errors by misunderstanding the frequently-unclear material that was there earlier!
Allens (
talk |
contribs) 19:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)reply
S&P Leveraged Loan Index is badly outdated. it descibes some "current" index values as indicative of economic distress — and the references date back 5+ years. Could give an uninformed reader erroneous view of current economy. —
2606:A000:678C:9300:39CC:5504:29F9:5DFD (
talk) 23:08, 18 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Warrant (finance): somewhat confusing and overly focused on certain types of warrants. A challenging article to improve as warrants work differently in different markets – will probably require expertise or a lot of research. —
Mx. Granger (
talk·contribs) 17:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
VIX: poorly sourced, confusingly written, and needs more information. This is an important topic and deserves a better article. —
Mx. Granger (
talk·contribs) 17:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
CMT Association: Someone recently proposed its deletion which was denied because it's still a notable organization, especially for folks in technical analysis. However, the way it's written needs clean up by 1. Delete uncited material 2. Adding citations 3. Revise non-neutral/advertising language. I would encourage anyone familiar with the designation to help out. Thank you. -
Kazuha1029 (
talk) 02:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Financial analyst: Please revisit its rating; it's undergone a substantial rework in the last year. Thanks.
Fintor (
talk) 10:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Immunization (Finance): there's a lot of good explanation here, but it contains only one citation. Needs additional citations to improve verifiability. Cordially,
BuzzWeiser196 (
talk) 10:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Environmental finance Requesting assessment. The article has started as a stub but I have contributed signifacntly and believe it is at least a C class article. Thanks!
Biographies of Federal agencies are easy to do, because the agency websites have biographies, and other websites have more information about nominees/commissioners. I have done several myself, but right now I am working in other areas, especially
Municipal authority (Pennsylvania) connected agencies, such as those shown in
List of municipal authorities in Philadelphia. Please consider doing some biographies of these commissioners.
Fintor do you still want someone to take a look at this article? Also, is this an assessment request or a content peer review request?
A. C. Santacruz ⁂
Please ping me! 12:33, 27 March 2022 (UTC)reply
I'd like to see the history of the carried interest 'loophole'. When was it passed, at least?
Craig234
That seems to be one not really trivial aspect of the
HIRE Act[1]
(
... or better not really sure to get the right infos as non-expert in this subject and to make matters worse in awareness of my alien English)
It would be nice, if a native speaker & expert could clarify this knowledge gap! (
Jaybear (
talk) 16:42, 21 December 2012 (UTC))reply
Financial economics - just "completed" a major re-write. Please review the article, as well revisit its quality-rating.
Fintor (
talk) 07:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC). Please review changes of last few days.
Fintor (
talk) 12:59, 6 January 2016 (UTC)reply
There are a number of missing articles related to actuarial science. For example, standard property and casualty reserving techniques such as chain-ladder have no articles and are, in my opinion, notable. -
KaJunl (
talk) 01:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
We need coverage of
continuation funds, an investment vehicle of private equite companies in which they sell the vehicle to themselves for profit. One source is
FT article. —
Ixtal(
T /
C ) ⁂ Join
WP:FINANCE! 16:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Requests backlog
Meat and Livestock Australia Hi, I have expanded this article over the past few months and the article has reached a C-class article status. Assessment against the b-class article criteria would be highly appreciated. Thank you!
Umbrella.Won (
talk) 01:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Net capital rule - This article really needs someone with regulatory knowledge and the expertise to interpret the online news articles covering the post-2004 changes to this topic. I've done some work on the intro (watch for subtle bias throughout), but the rest of the article (and the ghastly footnote section) reads like a lawyer trying to make sense out of a bunch of primary documents.—
DMCer™ 14:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Debt-to-capital ratio - This is a short job, but it's been requesting attention from an expert in the economics portal for ~2 years. It just needs a bit of cleanup (there's
talk of including it in
Template:Stock market once this happens). Thanks.—
DMCer™ 14:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Put option - I believe the formula listed for calculating the premium paid to the seller of a put contract is flawed completely undermining article.
SamISmyth (
talk) 06:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Payday loan and
Predatory lending - The payday loan article has suffered from back and forth editing from both sides of this issue and could use the expertise of financial editors who can cut through the lobbying/pr/advocate/other noise stuff to get to the encyclopedic tone and sources. I can usually help with sourcing, but please see the article history and
Talk:Payday loan.
Flowanda |
Talk 02:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Yield spread,
Yield curve spread,
TED spread,
Mortgage yield, etc. - Foundational concepts about yields and spreads should be explained clearly. But we also need to rethink how these very similar pages are related to one another. Some of them are confusingly similar.
Finnancier (
talk) 15:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Sovys / Sovereign yield spread futures. I've created a redirect to CME but I think an article could make sense... however they're so shite that it's hardly important! EggCentric 08:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Regulation S-K: I just copyedited this, and there are a number of areas needing attention - most especially making sure I didn't introduce any errors by misunderstanding the frequently-unclear material that was there earlier!
Allens (
talk |
contribs) 19:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)reply
S&P Leveraged Loan Index is badly outdated. it descibes some "current" index values as indicative of economic distress — and the references date back 5+ years. Could give an uninformed reader erroneous view of current economy. —
2606:A000:678C:9300:39CC:5504:29F9:5DFD (
talk) 23:08, 18 May 2018 (UTC)reply