Considered a highly influential film in the Indian society, this article underwent a successful GA nomination recently. Thereafter I've made a lot of edits to increase its comprehensiveness. However, I would vastly gain from insights provided by external experienced editors. After considering and implementing your valuable comments and suggestions, I would like to make its best pitch at FAC. Thanking you in advance!
Mspraveen (
talk) 05:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
:I'd suggest that you move this review to
A-class review instead, since this is already at GA.
Girolamo Savonarola (
talk) 11:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
I'll get the ball rolling with this one... :)
Those were the most immediate things I noticed, besides a few copyediting issues. But on the whole it's a very thorough and well-written article. PC78 ( talk) 12:49, 8 August 2008 (UTC) reply
This article was really interesting to read and is well-sourced throughout. I have listed multiple suggestions below (don't be overwhelmed, the majority are very simple fixes) and will be happy to take another look once they are addressed. If you have any questions about these, just place a comment underneath them. Good job so far, I believe the article is close to A-class. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 04:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Thanks so much for the detailed review. I sincerely appreciate you taking out time in doing so. Should you have any concerns in my response, please feel free to let me know. Thanks once again. Mspraveen ( talk) 05:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Considered a highly influential film in the Indian society, this article underwent a successful GA nomination recently. Thereafter I've made a lot of edits to increase its comprehensiveness. However, I would vastly gain from insights provided by external experienced editors. After considering and implementing your valuable comments and suggestions, I would like to make its best pitch at FAC. Thanking you in advance!
Mspraveen (
talk) 05:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
:I'd suggest that you move this review to
A-class review instead, since this is already at GA.
Girolamo Savonarola (
talk) 11:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
I'll get the ball rolling with this one... :)
Those were the most immediate things I noticed, besides a few copyediting issues. But on the whole it's a very thorough and well-written article. PC78 ( talk) 12:49, 8 August 2008 (UTC) reply
This article was really interesting to read and is well-sourced throughout. I have listed multiple suggestions below (don't be overwhelmed, the majority are very simple fixes) and will be happy to take another look once they are addressed. If you have any questions about these, just place a comment underneath them. Good job so far, I believe the article is close to A-class. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 04:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Thanks so much for the detailed review. I sincerely appreciate you taking out time in doing so. Should you have any concerns in my response, please feel free to let me know. Thanks once again. Mspraveen ( talk) 05:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply