![]() | This WikiProject Film page is an archive, log collection, or currently inactive page; it is kept primarily for historical interest. | ![]() |
Failed - tabled for too long without further action or review. Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 07:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This list is currently too short to pass at WP:FLC, so I'd like to get it to A-class as a form of recognition. I realize that we haven't had lists before for WP:FILM, but I know other projects (namely WP:VG from the top of my head) accept lists at A-class review. Again, as this list cannot pass FLC period, A-class is basically as far as it can go. Cheers, sephiroth bcr ( converse) 08:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Considered a highly influential film in the Indian society, this article underwent a successful GA nomination recently. Thereafter I've made a lot of edits to increase its comprehensiveness. However, I would vastly gain from insights provided by external experienced editors. After considering and implementing your valuable comments and suggestions, I would like to make its best pitch at FAC. Thanking you in advance!
Mspraveen (
talk) 05:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
:I'd suggest that you move this review to
A-class review instead, since this is already at GA.
Girolamo Savonarola (
talk) 11:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
I'll get the ball rolling with this one... :)
Those were the most immediate things I noticed, besides a few copyediting issues. But on the whole it's a very thorough and well-written article. PC78 ( talk) 12:49, 8 August 2008 (UTC) reply
This article was really interesting to read and is well-sourced throughout. I have listed multiple suggestions below (don't be overwhelmed, the majority are very simple fixes) and will be happy to take another look once they are addressed. If you have any questions about these, just place a comment underneath them. Good job so far, I believe the article is close to A-class. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 04:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Thanks so much for the detailed review. I sincerely appreciate you taking out time in doing so. Should you have any concerns in my response, please feel free to let me know. Thanks once again. Mspraveen ( talk) 05:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn due to gaining FL-class. Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 15:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Another list not long enough to pass FLC. Do note that this is the only other list I have at the moment that I want to send through A-class review. Not trying to flood the process :p sephiroth bcr ( converse) 00:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC) reply
As this list is now a FL, this nomination can effectively be considered moot. Can someone archive this? As I'm unfamiliar with the archiving process :p — sephiroth bcr ( converse) 02:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Closed as not supported. Girolamo Savonarola ( talk)
I am nominating this article for A-class becasue it meets all the criteria and I want to get a few more tips before nominating it for featured article status again. Limetolime talk to me • look what I did! 20:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC) reply
One of the last reviewers had commented that this article is not yet ready for another review, and regretfully, I must concur especially in the area of "Reaction" as it is overlong, two or three opinions will suffice and as I indicated earlier, there may be need to continue to work on this as a project. The use of a number of fansites or blog-type reviewers is an area of debate anong reviewers and is normally not highly regarded as a means of substantiation. FWiW, I would caution that the article itself is comprehensive but perhaps too detailed for what amounts to a singular project and one that is generally considered a failure. Bzuk ( talk) 12:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC). reply
Failed - tabled for too long without review. PC78 ( talk) 01:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Previous A-class review (23:17, 31 May 2008)
I want to try again and reach A-class status. Limetolime Talk to me • look what I did! 19:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC) reply
![]() | This WikiProject Film page is an archive, log collection, or currently inactive page; it is kept primarily for historical interest. | ![]() |
Failed - tabled for too long without further action or review. Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 07:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This list is currently too short to pass at WP:FLC, so I'd like to get it to A-class as a form of recognition. I realize that we haven't had lists before for WP:FILM, but I know other projects (namely WP:VG from the top of my head) accept lists at A-class review. Again, as this list cannot pass FLC period, A-class is basically as far as it can go. Cheers, sephiroth bcr ( converse) 08:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Considered a highly influential film in the Indian society, this article underwent a successful GA nomination recently. Thereafter I've made a lot of edits to increase its comprehensiveness. However, I would vastly gain from insights provided by external experienced editors. After considering and implementing your valuable comments and suggestions, I would like to make its best pitch at FAC. Thanking you in advance!
Mspraveen (
talk) 05:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
:I'd suggest that you move this review to
A-class review instead, since this is already at GA.
Girolamo Savonarola (
talk) 11:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
I'll get the ball rolling with this one... :)
Those were the most immediate things I noticed, besides a few copyediting issues. But on the whole it's a very thorough and well-written article. PC78 ( talk) 12:49, 8 August 2008 (UTC) reply
This article was really interesting to read and is well-sourced throughout. I have listed multiple suggestions below (don't be overwhelmed, the majority are very simple fixes) and will be happy to take another look once they are addressed. If you have any questions about these, just place a comment underneath them. Good job so far, I believe the article is close to A-class. Happy editing! -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 04:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Thanks so much for the detailed review. I sincerely appreciate you taking out time in doing so. Should you have any concerns in my response, please feel free to let me know. Thanks once again. Mspraveen ( talk) 05:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn due to gaining FL-class. Girolamo Savonarola ( talk) 15:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Another list not long enough to pass FLC. Do note that this is the only other list I have at the moment that I want to send through A-class review. Not trying to flood the process :p sephiroth bcr ( converse) 00:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC) reply
As this list is now a FL, this nomination can effectively be considered moot. Can someone archive this? As I'm unfamiliar with the archiving process :p — sephiroth bcr ( converse) 02:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Closed as not supported. Girolamo Savonarola ( talk)
I am nominating this article for A-class becasue it meets all the criteria and I want to get a few more tips before nominating it for featured article status again. Limetolime talk to me • look what I did! 20:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC) reply
One of the last reviewers had commented that this article is not yet ready for another review, and regretfully, I must concur especially in the area of "Reaction" as it is overlong, two or three opinions will suffice and as I indicated earlier, there may be need to continue to work on this as a project. The use of a number of fansites or blog-type reviewers is an area of debate anong reviewers and is normally not highly regarded as a means of substantiation. FWiW, I would caution that the article itself is comprehensive but perhaps too detailed for what amounts to a singular project and one that is generally considered a failure. Bzuk ( talk) 12:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC). reply
Failed - tabled for too long without review. PC78 ( talk) 01:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Previous A-class review (23:17, 31 May 2008)
I want to try again and reach A-class status. Limetolime Talk to me • look what I did! 19:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC) reply