Points of interest related to
Ice hockey on Wikipedia: Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Ice hockey. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
watch |
Article about a small-town municipal recreation centre, not
properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for local buildings. As always, arenas are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to show passage of
WP:GNG on third-party reliable source coverage about them in media -- but this is referenced entirely to the
self-published websites of entities directly affiliated with the venue -- the town government, the local minor hockey league, the local junior hockey team and a local real estate agent -- with not even one hit of GNG-worthy coverage shown at all.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to be referenced better than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
17:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Points of interest related to
Ice hockey on Wikipedia: Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Ice hockey. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
watch |
Article about a small-town municipal recreation centre, not
properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for local buildings. As always, arenas are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to show passage of
WP:GNG on third-party reliable source coverage about them in media -- but this is referenced entirely to the
self-published websites of entities directly affiliated with the venue -- the town government, the local minor hockey league, the local junior hockey team and a local real estate agent -- with not even one hit of GNG-worthy coverage shown at all.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to be referenced better than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
17:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)