Main page | To do | Participants | Sources and references | Guidelines for articles and templates | Notability | Discuss |
Notability is a central issue related to contemporary art because contemporary art often refers to biographies of living persons, because of the current coverage of contemporary art on Wikipedia is not extensive (general articles, acknowledgment of the sources) and because the Wikipedia community interested in contemporary art is not particularly large and active. To verify the notability of people, institutions, events, books, journals it is necessary to follow specific guidelines. Wikipedia:Notability says: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."
Notability of PeopleTo define the notability of a creative professional (authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals) you need reliable, independent sources on the subject which state one of the following:
Criteria for academicsTo define the notability of an academic you need reliable, independent sources on the subject which state one of the following:
Wikipedia:Notability (academics) Living personsEditors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page [2] AutobiographyWriting an autobiography on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged, unless your writing has been approved by other editors in the community. Editing a biography about yourself should only be done in clear-cut cases. Wikipedia has gone through many prolonged disputes about the significance, factual accuracy, and neutrality of such articles.[1] Avoiding such editing keeps Wikipedia neutral and helps avoid pushing a particular point of view. Writing autobiographies is discouraged because it is difficult to write a neutral, verifiable autobiography, and there are many pitfalls. If you create an autobiography, you must have no promotional intent and must be willing to accept it being neutralized if it is not neutral, or even deleted if it comes to that. If you do turn out to be notable, you must expect the article to stay—you cannot just get it deleted because you are not happy with it. Our neutral point of view policy is absolute and non-negotiable, and all encyclopedic topics are fair game for Wikipedia. Articles about you
Notability of institutionsOrganizations are usually notable if they meet both of the following standards:
Additional considerations are:
Although an organization that fails to meet the criteria of this guideline should not have a separate article, information about the organization may nevertheless be included in other ways in Wikipedia provided that certain conditions are met. Content about the organization can be added into relevant articles if it:
For organizations local to a city, town, or county, content conforming to the above criteria may be added to articles for that locale. For example, a business that is significant to the history or economy of a small town might be described in the ==History== or ==Economy== section of the small town. Before starting an article on a non-profit organization, please keep in mind the following [3]:
Notability of events
Notability of mediaNotability is presumed for newspapers, magazines and journals that verifiably meet through reliable sources, one or more of the following criteria:
Publications that primarily carry advertising, and only have trivial content, may have relevant details merged to an article on their publisher (if notable). Notability of artworksWikipedia articles must not contain original research [4] Primary sources are often difficult to use appropriately. While they can be both reliable and useful in certain situations, they must be used with caution in order to avoid original research. Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources. Tertiary sources such as compendia, encyclopedias, textbooks, obituaries, and other summarizing sources may be used to give overviews or summaries, but should not be used in place of secondary sources for detailed discussion. Source material must have been published [5]. Use sources that directly support the material presented in an article and are appropriate to the claims made. The best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments. The greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues, the more reliable the source.
Sources can be online or offline. On Wikipedia, we assume good faith. There is no distinction between using online versus offline sources. Offline sources are just as legitimate as those that are accessible to everyone online [8] To check how reliable is a sourceYou need to make sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered [9].
What you can NOT use as a source
How to use sources
|
Main page | To do | Participants | Sources and references | Guidelines for articles and templates | Notability | Discuss |
Notability is a central issue related to contemporary art because contemporary art often refers to biographies of living persons, because of the current coverage of contemporary art on Wikipedia is not extensive (general articles, acknowledgment of the sources) and because the Wikipedia community interested in contemporary art is not particularly large and active. To verify the notability of people, institutions, events, books, journals it is necessary to follow specific guidelines. Wikipedia:Notability says: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."
Notability of PeopleTo define the notability of a creative professional (authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals) you need reliable, independent sources on the subject which state one of the following:
Criteria for academicsTo define the notability of an academic you need reliable, independent sources on the subject which state one of the following:
Wikipedia:Notability (academics) Living personsEditors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page [2] AutobiographyWriting an autobiography on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged, unless your writing has been approved by other editors in the community. Editing a biography about yourself should only be done in clear-cut cases. Wikipedia has gone through many prolonged disputes about the significance, factual accuracy, and neutrality of such articles.[1] Avoiding such editing keeps Wikipedia neutral and helps avoid pushing a particular point of view. Writing autobiographies is discouraged because it is difficult to write a neutral, verifiable autobiography, and there are many pitfalls. If you create an autobiography, you must have no promotional intent and must be willing to accept it being neutralized if it is not neutral, or even deleted if it comes to that. If you do turn out to be notable, you must expect the article to stay—you cannot just get it deleted because you are not happy with it. Our neutral point of view policy is absolute and non-negotiable, and all encyclopedic topics are fair game for Wikipedia. Articles about you
Notability of institutionsOrganizations are usually notable if they meet both of the following standards:
Additional considerations are:
Although an organization that fails to meet the criteria of this guideline should not have a separate article, information about the organization may nevertheless be included in other ways in Wikipedia provided that certain conditions are met. Content about the organization can be added into relevant articles if it:
For organizations local to a city, town, or county, content conforming to the above criteria may be added to articles for that locale. For example, a business that is significant to the history or economy of a small town might be described in the ==History== or ==Economy== section of the small town. Before starting an article on a non-profit organization, please keep in mind the following [3]:
Notability of events
Notability of mediaNotability is presumed for newspapers, magazines and journals that verifiably meet through reliable sources, one or more of the following criteria:
Publications that primarily carry advertising, and only have trivial content, may have relevant details merged to an article on their publisher (if notable). Notability of artworksWikipedia articles must not contain original research [4] Primary sources are often difficult to use appropriately. While they can be both reliable and useful in certain situations, they must be used with caution in order to avoid original research. Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources. Tertiary sources such as compendia, encyclopedias, textbooks, obituaries, and other summarizing sources may be used to give overviews or summaries, but should not be used in place of secondary sources for detailed discussion. Source material must have been published [5]. Use sources that directly support the material presented in an article and are appropriate to the claims made. The best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments. The greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues, the more reliable the source.
Sources can be online or offline. On Wikipedia, we assume good faith. There is no distinction between using online versus offline sources. Offline sources are just as legitimate as those that are accessible to everyone online [8] To check how reliable is a sourceYou need to make sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered [9].
What you can NOT use as a source
How to use sources
|